Courts generally presume that a lawsuit has been filed in good faith, and a party moving for sanctions against the party who filed a lawsuit or claim must overcome this presumption to prove abuse of the judicial process. Thus, courts distinguish between (1) claims that are ultimately found to be merely groundless (and thus not sanctionable) and (2) claims that are ultimately found to be both groundless and brought in bad faith or for the purpose of harassment (and thus sanctionable). The sanctions rules generally do not require a party or its attorney to be right; they require the party or its attorney to make a reasonable inquiry into the facts and the laws related to the claims.

Contempt of court is broadly defined as disobedience to or disrespect of a court by acting in opposition to its authority. Contempt of court may be punished by the court with civil and criminal sanctions or penalties.

In Idaho, as in other jurisdictions, there is a legal presumption that lawsuits are filed in good faith. For a party to face sanctions for filing a lawsuit, the opposing party must demonstrate that the lawsuit constitutes an abuse of the judicial process. This means showing that the claim was not only groundless but also filed in bad faith or for purposes of harassment. Idaho courts adhere to sanction rules that do not penalize parties or their attorneys for simply being wrong in their legal positions; rather, they must have failed to conduct a reasonable inquiry into the facts and applicable laws before filing claims. Regarding contempt of court, Idaho recognizes this as an act of disobedience or disrespect towards the court's authority, which can be met with either civil or criminal sanctions, depending on the nature of the contempt. This ensures that the integrity of the judicial process is maintained and that the courts' orders are taken seriously.