Select your state

Civil procedure

directed verdict

A directed verdict is a procedure used by judges during trial to dismiss one or more claims when the party with the burden of proof (plaintiff) has failed to introduce evidence that is sufficient for a reasonable jury to find in favor of the party with the burden of proof. A directed verdict is like a summary judgment, but happens during trial rather than before trial.

In Wyoming, a directed verdict is a legal mechanism that a judge can use during a trial when the party with the burden of proof, typically the plaintiff, has not presented evidence that is strong enough for a reasonable jury to rule in their favor. This procedure is governed by Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 50. After the plaintiff has presented their case, the defendant can move for a directed verdict. If the judge grants the motion, the case is resolved without the need for the defense to present its case or for the jury to deliberate. A directed verdict is similar to a summary judgment, which is a pre-trial ruling that also involves a determination that there are no genuine issues of material fact necessitating a trial. However, a directed verdict occurs after the trial has begun and the plaintiff has had the opportunity to present their case, whereas a summary judgment is decided before the trial starts based on the pleadings, depositions, and other evidence submitted to the court.

Legal Articles

State Statutes

Individual & Family Legal Plan

As a LegalFix member, you'll get expert legal services from a local law firm that treats you like an important client. Don't wait—be prepared for life's inevitable legal challenges starting today. And ask your employer, credit union, or membership group about preferred pricing opportunities.

Civil procedure

directed verdict

Individual & Family Legal Plan

Articles

Wyoming State Code

Wyoming State Code

Civil procedure

directed verdict

Articles