A directed verdict is a procedure used by judges during trial to dismiss one or more claims when the party with the burden of proof (plaintiff) has failed to introduce evidence that is sufficient for a reasonable jury to find in favor of the party with the burden of proof. A directed verdict is like a summary judgment, but happens during trial rather than before trial.
In Mississippi, a directed verdict is a ruling by the court during a jury trial, typically requested by the defense, where the judge determines that the plaintiff (the party with the burden of proof) has not presented legally sufficient evidence to support a claim or claims, such that no reasonable jury could find in the plaintiff's favor. This procedural move occurs after the plaintiff has presented all of their evidence but before the case is sent to the jury for deliberation. The Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically Rule 50, govern the process for requesting and granting a directed verdict. If the judge grants a directed verdict, it means that the case (or the specific claims affected by the ruling) ends without the jury rendering a decision on those matters. A directed verdict is similar to a summary judgment, which is also a judgment entered by the court in favor of one party without a full trial, but it is distinct in that a summary judgment is decided before the trial begins, based on legal arguments and evidence presented in motions and pleadings.