A directed verdict is a procedure used by judges during trial to dismiss one or more claims when the party with the burden of proof (plaintiff) has failed to introduce evidence that is sufficient for a reasonable jury to find in favor of the party with the burden of proof. A directed verdict is like a summary judgment, but happens during trial rather than before trial.
In Louisiana, a directed verdict is a ruling by the court during a jury trial, where the judge determines that no reasonable jury could reach a different conclusion based on the evidence presented. This procedure is governed by the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure. Specifically, Article 1810 provides that after the plaintiff has completed the presentation of evidence, the defendant may move for a directed verdict. If the court finds that the evidence favorably supports the plaintiff to such a degree that reasonable minds could not differ, the motion for a directed verdict should be denied. Conversely, if the evidence is insufficient to support the plaintiff's claim, the court may grant a directed verdict in favor of the defendant. This is similar to a summary judgment, which is decided before a trial begins, but a directed verdict occurs after the trial has started and typically after the plaintiff has presented their case.