A directed verdict is a procedure used by judges during trial to dismiss one or more claims when the party with the burden of proof (plaintiff) has failed to introduce evidence that is sufficient for a reasonable jury to find in favor of the party with the burden of proof. A directed verdict is like a summary judgment, but happens during trial rather than before trial.
In Colorado, a directed verdict is a legal mechanism governed by the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically Rule 50. This rule allows a judge to issue a directed verdict during a trial when the party with the burden of proof, typically the plaintiff, has presented their case and the evidence is insufficient for a reasonable jury to find in their favor. The directed verdict effectively ends that part of the case without it going to the jury for deliberation. It is similar to a summary judgment, which is a pre-trial ruling that also can resolve a case or claim without a trial, but a directed verdict occurs after the trial has begun and the plaintiff has presented their evidence. The purpose of a directed verdict is to prevent a case from going to the jury when there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a reasonable jury to return a verdict for the party bearing the burden of proof.