First Amendment litigation involving book censorship in schools has usually turned on the rights of a school board to control classroom curricula by prohibiting the use of certain texts, and an inquiry into whether a certain challenged text is vulgar. Some federal courts have distinguished between objective vulgarity—which a school board may prohibit—and the subject matter of a book (witchcraft, lesbian romance) with which the school board members may personally disagree or have a distaste for—and which a school board may not prohibit.

But one federal court recently stated that book banning takes place when a government or its officials forbid or prohibit others from having a book. The term does not apply where a school district—through its authorized school board—decides not to continue possessing the book on its own library shelves. The school board is the entity that has the ultimate authority to decide what books will be purchased and kept on the shelves of the schools in the district—and the school board can decide not to purchase and shelve a book in the first place.

In Utah, as in other states, First Amendment litigation related to book censorship in schools often hinges on the balance between a school board's authority to manage classroom curricula and the rights to free speech and access to information. School boards have the discretion to exclude texts they find objectively vulgar from the curriculum. However, federal courts have indicated that school boards cannot ban books based on subjective disapproval of topics like witchcraft or LGBTQ+ themes. A recent federal court ruling clarified that 'book banning' refers to the act of government officials prohibiting possession of a book. This is distinct from a school board's decision not to purchase or retain a book in a school's library, which falls within the school board's purview to determine the composition of its library's collection. Thus, while school boards in Utah have significant control over their libraries' contents, their decisions must still navigate the complexities of First Amendment protections.