As with other speech forums and topics, persons are generally allowed to share or publish their opinions and truthful statements of fact about restaurants without legal liability—whether the publisher is a professional food critic or a customer at a neighborhood restaurant.

A person can publish critical statements such as "I wouldn't serve their food to my dog" or "it was the worst meal I have ever eaten" without fear of legal liability. But if a person publishes a statement of fact—a statement that can be proven to be true or false, such as whether a certain ingredient was included in a food item or whether there was a bug or worm in the food—the statement must be truthful or it will expose the person who published it to others (by speaking or writing it) to legal liability for defamation and damage to the restaurant's reputation.

Defamation is a false statement of fact that (1) is published; (2) damages or injures the reputation of another party; and (3) is made without legal excuse (defense or privilege).

Defamation may be in the form of a written statement (libel) or a spoken statement (slander) and is a tort or legal wrong that may create civil liability (for money damages) for a person who makes a defamatory statement that is not privileged (e.g., made during a judicial proceeding) and for which there is no defense (such as truth or retraction).

To be actionable and subject the person making the statement to liability the statement must be published to a third party. In other words, a written or spoken statement made from one person to another that is not read or heard by a third person (or could not have been reasonably expected by the person making the statement to be read or heard by a third person) is not published and is not defamation.

But a statement spoken to another person, or sent in an email or text message to another person, or published online meets the requirement of publication for a potential defamation claim.

In Kansas, individuals have the right to express their opinions and make truthful statements about restaurants without legal liability. This means that both professional critics and customers can share their views, even if they are negative, such as saying 'I wouldn't serve their food to my dog' or 'it was the worst meal I have ever eaten.' However, when making a statement of fact, such as claiming a dish contained a certain ingredient or that there was a bug in the food, the statement must be true. Publishing a false statement of fact can lead to legal liability for defamation if it harms the restaurant's reputation. Defamation involves a false statement that is published, injurious to someone's reputation, and made without a legal defense. It can be in the form of libel (written) or slander (spoken) and may result in civil liability. For a defamation claim to be valid, the statement must be communicated to a third party. Private communications that are not shared with others do not meet the publication requirement for defamation.