Disputes over the quality of food and drink; whether certain food and beverage items were ordered by the customer; and whether the correct food and beverage items were delivered to the table or consumed by the customer are sometimes the subject of disputes between restaurants and their customers.

Laws vary from state to state but it is generally in both parties’ interests to resolve a dispute by agreement while the customer is still in the restaurant. If the customer leaves the restaurant without paying the amount the restaurant claims is owed, the customer may be charged with violating the state’s dine and dash laws. And if the situation escalates and the customer becomes disruptive or threatening, the restaurant may call the police while the customer is still in the restaurant, and the customer may be charged with other civil and criminal offenses.

Although a restaurant’s customer may dispute a charge with their credit card issuer/bank after leaving the restaurant, the customer’s success in having the charge removed by the bank does not preclude the restaurant from filing a criminal complaint and asking the local prosecutor to charge the customer with a crime—or from filing a civil lawsuit for payment of the goods (food and drink).

In South Carolina, disputes over the quality of food and drink, whether the correct items were ordered and delivered, are ideally resolved while the customer is still at the restaurant. If a customer leaves without paying, they may face legal consequences under South Carolina's 'defrauding a restaurant' statute (S.C. Code Ann. § 16-13-420). This law makes it a misdemeanor to leave without paying for food, services, or accommodations. If a customer disputes a charge with their bank after leaving, it does not prevent the restaurant from pursuing criminal charges or filing a civil lawsuit for payment. Additionally, if a customer becomes disruptive or threatening, the restaurant can involve law enforcement, and the customer may face other civil or criminal charges. It is in both parties' interests to amicably resolve disputes on-site to avoid legal complications.