Some states have laws (statutes) that require a person to accurately provide their identification (ID) (name, residence address, date of birth) to the police if the police have reasonable suspicion to believe (1) a crime has been committed, is being committed, or is about to be committed and (2) the person asked to provide identification is involved as a participant or as a witness. If there is no reasonable suspicion, a person does not have to provide identification—but courts often find reasonable suspicion as a matter of course.

These statutes are sometimes called stop-and-identify laws or stop and ID laws, and the violation of the statute may be a criminal offense or crime known as “failure to ID.” Stop and ID laws vary from state to state in the states that have such laws. For example, in some states failure to ID cannot be the basis for an arrest (there must be an underlying criminal offense) and in some states the obligation to provide identification only applies to a person who has been arrested.

And in some states it is a criminal offense for a person to provide a false or fictitious name, residence address, or date of birth if the person has been detained by police on the basis of reasonable suspicion or is believed to be a witness to a criminal offense.

The United States Supreme Court has held that the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution may allow suspects to refuse to give their name if they have a reasonable belief their name could be incriminating. Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 (1983).

In Washington State, there is no specific 'stop and identify' statute that requires individuals to provide their identification to police officers under all circumstances. However, under certain conditions, such as when an officer has reasonable suspicion that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed, and the individual is believed to be involved, the police may detain the person and request identification. Failure to provide identification under these circumstances could lead to further investigation or detention. Additionally, RCW 9A.76.175 makes it a gross misdemeanor for a person to give a false or misleading name, date of birth, or address to a public servant with the intent to deceive. As for the Fifth Amendment protections, individuals may invoke their right to remain silent if they reasonably believe that providing their name could be self-incriminating, in line with the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Kolender v. Lawson. It's important to note that the application of these laws can be complex and context-specific, and individuals should consult with an attorney for advice pertaining to their particular situation.