A partition or exchange agreement allows married couples in community property states who are anticipating separation or divorce or otherwise wanting to change the ownership of certain community property assets to do so by agreement. Community property is generally property that is acquired by either spouse during marriage (and thus owned by both spouses), with exceptions for property such as gifts, inheritances, and assets owned before marriage.
A partition or exchange agreement allows a married couple to change the legal character or nature of community property assets—whether cash, stocks, bonds, real estate, retirement accounts, artwork, jewelry, or other property—to separate property assets by dividing (partitioning) their community property assets into separate property interests or by exchanging their community property interests in different assets to make one asset the separate property of one spouse and the other asset the separate property of the other spouse.
The partition or exchange agreement may also provide that future earnings and income arising from the transferred property will be the separate property of the spouse who owns it (income from separate property is generally community property, absent an agreement to the contrary).
The law usually requires an agreement changing the nature or characterization of property during marriage to be in writing but provides that such agreements do not require the exchange of something of value by both parties (consideration), as is usually required to create an enforceable agreement.
Reasons A Partition or Exchange Agreement May Be Unenforceable
A partition or exchange agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties. A partition or exchange agreement is not enforceable if the party against whom enforcement is requested proves that:
• the party did not sign the agreement voluntarily; or
• the agreement was unconscionable when it was signed and, before signing the agreement, that party: (1) was not provided a fair and reasonable disclosure of the property or financial obligations of the other party; (2) did not voluntarily and expressly waive (in writing) any right to disclosure of the property or financial obligations of the other party beyond the disclosure provided; and (3) did not have and could not reasonably have had adequate knowledge of the property or financial obligations of the other party.
A question of unconscionability of a partition or exchange agreement is usually decided by the court as a matter of law rather than by the jury as a matter of fact.
Recording a Partition or Exchange Agreement in County Deed Records
By recording a partition or exchange agreement that involves real property (real estate) in the county deed records, a property-owner spouse may protect partitioned-or-exchanged separate property from a creditor’s claim that a judgment against the other spouse can be satisfied from the partitioned-or-exchanged property because it is the kind of property that is usually community property and the creditor had no notice it was not community property.
Law is Often Located in State Statutes
In many states the law regarding partition or exchange agreements is located in the state’s statutes—often in the family code or domestic relations code.
Hawaii is not a community property state; it is an 'equitable distribution' state, which means that marital property is not automatically presumed to be owned by both spouses and is instead divided equitably in a divorce, not necessarily equally. However, Hawaii does recognize the ability of spouses to enter into agreements regarding the division of their property. These agreements are similar to partition or exchange agreements in community property states and can be used to delineate separate property interests. In Hawaii, such agreements must be in writing and signed by both parties to be enforceable. They can be used to divide or exchange marital assets and to designate future earnings from these assets as separate property. To ensure enforceability, both parties must enter into the agreement voluntarily and with full disclosure of each other's assets and financial obligations. If an agreement is found to be unconscionable, or if one party did not have adequate knowledge of the other's finances and did not waive the right to that information, it may be deemed unenforceable. While Hawaii's statutes do not specifically address partition or exchange agreements as they would in community property states, the principles of contract law and equitable distribution at divorce would apply to such agreements.
