The navigable areas of oceans, rivers, bays, and tidal zones are owned by the public and generally available for public use. A common area of dispute is whether a private property owner has the right to control use of and access to lakes, streams, and rivers on private property (sometimes known as riparian rights)—and whether federal or state governments have the right to regulate use of such waterways.

Much of the question turns on whether the waterway is navigable or unnavigable (nonnavigable). Navigable waters are, as the name implies, waters that can be navigated—or easily made navigable—traditionally for purposes of transporting goods in intrastate (within one state) or interstate (between two or more states) commerce.

Thus, a waterway in its original condition might have had substantial obstructions (falls, rapids, sand bars, bridges, portages, shifting currents, or similar obstructions) that were overcome by frontier boats or portages and used as a channel of commerce—even though boats had to be removed from the water in some stretches, or logs be brought around an obstruction by means of artificial chutes. But the question is ultimately a matter of degree and there is some point beyond which navigability cannot be established.

Lakes and rivers are generally navigable waters, and smaller bodies of water such as streams may also be navigable. The U.S. Supreme Court has created four tests for determining what constitutes navigable waters under federal law: (1) whether the body of water is subject to the ebb and flow of the tide; (2) whether the body of water connects with a continuous interstate waterway; (3) whether the body of water has navigable capacity; and (4) whether the body of water is actually navigable.

Navigable waterways (as defined by federal law) are under the jurisdiction of the federal government—rather than states or municipalities—based on the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8) of the U.S. Constitution. But waterways that do not meet the definition of navigable waters under federal law are under the jurisdiction of states and municipalities and may be considered navigable waters under state and municipal laws. Waterways that are unnavigable under both federal and state law may be subject to the control of the streamside landowner.

Laws vary from state to state, but some state courts have ruled that where the state legislature refuses to create a public trust for recreational purposes in unnavigable streams, the courts should not alter the legislature's statement of public policy by judicial legislation. These courts have reasoned that if unnavigable waters are to be appropriated for recreational use, the legislative process is the proper method to achieve this goal.

And in some states the public trust doctrine—a legal theory that requires states to hold and preserve certain natural resources for the public’s use and enjoyment—requires that navigable waterways be available for public use (at least flotation) even though they are located on private land.

In Kansas, as in other states, the distinction between navigable and non-navigable waters is significant for determining the extent of public access and private property rights. Navigable waters are generally considered public and are subject to federal jurisdiction under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court has established criteria for determining navigability, which includes the capacity for navigation and actual use for interstate commerce. Kansas state law adheres to the principle that navigable waters are held in trust for public use, which includes activities like boating and fishing. However, non-navigable waters may fall under the jurisdiction of the state or private landowners, depending on their location and use. If a waterway is deemed non-navigable, the adjacent property owner may have exclusive rights to the use of the water. The public trust doctrine in Kansas may require that navigable waterways, even when crossing private property, be accessible for public use. It is important to note that the classification of waterways and the rights of property owners can be complex, and specific disputes often require legal adjudication or legislative action to resolve.