Wrongful termination or wrongful discharge is a general reference to the illegal termination or firing of an employee. Because most employment is at will, for an indefinite term, and may be terminated at any time, wrongful termination or wrongful discharge claims are generally limited to circumstances under which (1) the employer violated an employee’s written employment agreement and terminated the employee for a reason other than good cause, or (2) the employer terminated or fired the employee for a discriminatory reason (age, race, color, sex, national origin, disability) in violation of federal or state law.

Most states follow the employment-at-will doctrine, and employment for an indefinite term may be terminated at will and without cause. Absent a specific contract term to the contrary, this doctrine allows an employee to quit or be terminated without liability on the part of the employer or the employee, with or without cause.

A discharged employee who asserts that the parties have contractually agreed to limit the employer’s right to terminate the employee at will has the burden of proving an express agreement or written representation to that effect. To rebut the presumption of employment at will, an employment contract must directly limit—in a meaningful and special way—the employer’s right to terminate the employee without cause.

In an employment-at-will situation, an employee policy handbook or manual does not, by itself, constitute a binding contract for the benefits and policies stated unless the manual uses language clearly indicating an intent to do so. In those cases holding that personnel manuals may create contractual rights, there is either language in the manuals expressing contractual intent, or the manuals were complemented by oral agreements making the policy provisions binding.

Thus, to prove a claim for wrongful discharge in breach of an employment agreement, a plaintiff must prove (1) the plaintiff had an enforceable employment agreement that directly limited—in a meaningful and special way—the employer’s right to terminate the employee without cause; (2) the plaintiff performed, tendered performance, or was excused from performing the contractual obligations; (3) the defendant breached the contract by wrongfully discharging the plaintiff from employment; and (4) the defendant’s breach of the employment contract caused the plaintiff damage.

The employment at will doctrine does not permit an employer to discriminate against an employee in violation of state or federal law, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. §2000e); the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) (29 U.S.C. §621); and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) (42 U.S.C. §12101).

In California, wrongful termination or wrongful discharge refers to the illegal firing of an employee in violation of an employment agreement or due to discriminatory reasons. While California follows the employment-at-will doctrine, allowing employers and employees to terminate employment without cause, there are exceptions. An employee can claim wrongful termination if they can prove they had an enforceable employment agreement that significantly limited the employer's right to terminate without cause, they fulfilled their contractual obligations, the employer breached the contract by wrongfully discharging them, and this breach caused damages. Additionally, the employment-at-will doctrine does not override state or federal anti-discrimination laws. Employers cannot terminate employees based on discriminatory reasons such as age, race, color, sex, national origin, or disability, as protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Employee handbooks or manuals may create contractual rights if they contain language indicating an intent to do so, sometimes supported by oral agreements.