Before or after a person’s arrest for a DUI/DWI criminal offense, police officers may ask the accused/defendant to submit to a breath test for alcohol concentration to determine whether the person is per se intoxicated. Per se intoxication is intoxication by definition—as defined in the state’s statutes, which is often a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .08 or higher (.05 in Utah). A breath test measures the amount of alcohol in the air a person exhales and uses that amount to estimate how much alcohol is in the person’s blood (BAC).

There are two types of breath tests: (1) a portable breath test (PBT) that is typically given in the field (at the side of the road or other place where a driver has been detained); and (2) the Intoxilyzer or DataMaster breathalyzer machine that is usually located at the police station. The results of a PBT are generally not admissible at trial but may be the basis for probable cause for the police officer to arrest a driver when the test shows a BAC of .08 or higher in most states (.05 in Utah). And the results of an Intoxilyzer test generally are admissible at trial.

All states have implied consent laws that make a driver’s consent or agreement to submit to a blood, breath, or urine test (a chemical test) when requested by a law enforcement officer a condition of the driver’s acceptance of a driver’s license offered by the state. Despite implied consent laws, in 2013 the United States Supreme Court held that if a person refuses to submit to having their blood drawn the police cannot draw the blood by force without a search warrant, as required under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. But more recently the Supreme Court upheld a nonconsensual blood draw of an unconscious person suspected of driving under the influence—based on the state’s implied consent laws and the exigent circumstances exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement.

And if a driver refuses to take a breath or blood test there are other consequences even if the police do not secure a search warrant for a blood draw—including fines, penalties, and automatic suspension of the driver’s license for a year or more.

In Alaska, as in all states, driving under the influence (DUI) laws prohibit operating a vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .08 or higher. Police officers may request a breath test if they suspect DUI. There are two types of breath tests: the portable breath test (PBT) used in the field, and the Intoxilyzer or DataMaster machine typically found at police stations. PBT results are usually not admissible in court but can establish probable cause for arrest, while Intoxilyzer results are generally admissible as evidence. Alaska has implied consent laws, meaning that by accepting a driver's license, drivers agree to submit to chemical tests if requested by law enforcement. Refusing a breath or blood test can lead to consequences such as fines, penalties, and automatic suspension of the driver's license. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that forced blood draws without a warrant are unconstitutional unless exigent circumstances exist, such as an unconscious suspect where implied consent is presumed. However, refusal to submit to a test can still result in legal penalties independent of a warrant.