One of the most contentious and often difficult parts of the divorce process is the division of the spouses’ marital debts. The spouses may be able to agree on how the debts will be divided—but often they cannot, and the court must determine how the debts will be divided—and sometimes the court will order certain assets be sold to facilitate the payment of the debts.

If the spouses live in a community property state (as opposed to an equitable distribution state), and if a debt was acquired by one spouse before the marriage, it will generally remain that spouse’s separate debt and obligation. But if the debt was acquired during the marriage it is a community debt and both spouses are responsible for it—at least in the eyes of the divorce court. Community property states generally include Alaska, Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin.

In other states—so-called equitable distribution or common law property states—the court attempts to divide the spouses’ debts equitably (fairly) and may order one spouse to use separate property to pay the debts, or may order marital property sold to pay the debts, and award one spouse more of the remaining marital property.

In practice, the difference between the division of debts in community property states and in equitable distribution states is sometimes not as great as it may seem, as the court in a community property state may have the discretion to divide the spouses’ community property and community debts on a 60-40, 70-30, or other unequal basis.

When evaluating the division of debts, it is also important to consider any tax implications for the division of the debts—such as the mortgage interest deduction on the spouses’ home—and the impact on a spouse’s credit when the other spouse is given a debt obligation in the divorce, but fails to pay the debt. Unless the creditor in such a situation has agreed to look only to the spouse given the debt, the creditor may pursue the other spouse for payment of a defaulted debt.

In Florida, which is an equitable distribution state, the division of marital debts during a divorce is based on fairness rather than an equal 50-50 split. This means that the court will attempt to divide the couple's debts in a manner that is fair and just for both parties, which may not necessarily be equal. Debts acquired by one spouse before the marriage typically remain that individual's responsibility, while debts incurred during the marriage are usually considered joint obligations. However, the court has the discretion to order one spouse to pay off the debts using separate property or to sell marital assets to cover the debts. The court may also compensate the other spouse by awarding them a larger share of the remaining marital property. It's important to note that even if a court assigns the responsibility for a debt to one spouse, creditors may still pursue the other spouse for payment if the debt is not satisfied, unless the creditor has agreed to release the other spouse from liability. Additionally, tax implications, such as mortgage interest deductions, and the impact on credit scores should be considered when dividing debts in a divorce.