The United States Supreme Court has recognized that the school setting requires some modification of the level of illegal activity required to justify a search of a student or the student’s property (purse, backpack, locker, phone, etc.).

The Court has held that there are two general requirements for a school administrator to search a student or the student’s property: (1) the school administrator must have reasonable suspicion (a lower standard than probable cause) that the search will turn up evidence that the student has violated or is violating the law or the rules of the school; and (2) the scope of the search must be reasonably related to the objectives of the search and not be excessively intrusive in light of the age and sex of the student and the nature of the suspected infraction. See Safford Unified School District #1 v. Redding, 557 U.S. 364 (2009); New Jersey v. TLO, 469 U.S. 325 (1985).

For example, there must be a reasonable suspicion of danger or that the student has hidden contraband such as drugs in the student’s underwear to extend the scope of a school search from outer clothes, backpacks, and purses, for example, to underwear and the likely exposure of private body parts.

This standard is designed to allow school authorities to maintain order in their schools without unduly burdening those efforts and without authorizing unrestrained intrusions on the privacy of schoolchildren.

In New Jersey, the standard for conducting searches of students or their property in schools is guided by the principles established by the U.S. Supreme Court, which requires a balance between the need to maintain an orderly school environment and the privacy rights of students. School administrators must have 'reasonable suspicion' to conduct a search, which is a lower threshold than 'probable cause.' This means that they must reasonably suspect that the search will reveal evidence of a violation of law or school rules. Additionally, the search must be proportionate to the suspected infraction and not excessively intrusive, considering the student's age, gender, and the nature of the suspected violation. The landmark cases of Safford Unified School District #1 v. Redding and New Jersey v. T.L.O. set the precedent for these requirements. For instance, a search extending to a student's underwear would require a reasonable suspicion of danger or the presence of contraband in such private areas. These standards aim to strike a balance between the need for school safety and the protection of students' privacy rights.