The American legal system is based on the principle that an independent, fair, and competent judiciary (judges) will interpret and apply the laws that govern us. The role of the judiciary is central to American concepts of justice and the rule of law.
Each state, and the federal court system, has a code of judicial conduct that requires judges to respect and honor the judicial office and strive to enhance and maintain confidence in our legal system by maintaining integrity and independence, and avoiding even the appearance of impropriety. The judge determines or finds facts and laws for the resolution of disputes, and is a highly visible symbol of government under the rule of law. A code of judicial conduct is not intended as an exhaustive guide for the conduct of judges—they should also be governed in their judicial and personal conduct by general ethical standards. But such a code is intended to state basic standards that should govern the conduct of all judges, and to provide guidance to judges in establishing and maintaining high standards of judicial and personal conduct.
Each state and the federal court system has people and processes who handle complaints against judges and determine what if any disciplinary action is appropriate.
In Washington State, the judiciary operates under the principle that an independent, fair, and competent judiciary is essential to justice and the rule of law. Judges in Washington are expected to adhere to the Code of Judicial Conduct, which sets forth the ethical standards and guidelines for their behavior both on and off the bench. This code emphasizes the importance of integrity, independence, and the avoidance of impropriety or its appearance. It serves as a framework for judges to maintain public confidence in the legal system. The Washington State Commission on Judicial Conduct is responsible for investigating complaints against judges and enforcing the Code of Judicial Conduct. When necessary, the Commission can recommend disciplinary actions to the Washington Supreme Court, which may include reprimand, censure, suspension, or removal from office. These measures ensure that judges are held accountable for their conduct, thereby upholding the high standards expected of the judiciary.