Gym and health club contracts are notoriously stringent and difficult to break, and have often been the subject of class action lawsuits and other litigation. But like other properly-executed contracts, gym and health club contracts are generally enforceable unless they are unconscionable as a matter of law (this is rare) or include provisions that are prohibited by law. Most states have specific laws (statutes) that limit the terms that may be included in gym and health club contracts—and if such a contract does not comply with the state’s laws, it is likely void and unenforceable—at least in part.

In Arizona, gym and health club contracts are subject to certain state regulations that aim to protect consumers. Under Arizona law, specifically Arizona Revised Statutes § 44-1792 to § 44-1795, health spa contracts have specific requirements and limitations. For example, these contracts cannot exceed a term of three years, and they must include a clause allowing for cancellation within three business days of signing. Additionally, if the facility is not yet open at the time of contract signing, there are provisions for cancellation and refund if the facility does not open within a certain timeframe. If a gym or health club contract does not adhere to these statutory requirements, it may be considered void and unenforceable. However, if the contract is properly executed and does not contain any unconscionable terms or prohibited provisions, it is generally enforceable. Consumers who believe their gym contract is unfair or does not comply with Arizona law may wish to consult with an attorney to explore their legal options.