Res judicata is the generic term for a group of related concepts concerning the conclusive effects given final judgments. Within this general doctrine there are two principal categories: (1) claim preclusion—also known as res judicata; and (2) issue preclusion—also known as collateral estoppel.
These legal doctrines generally preclude litigants from relitigating claims and issues that were previously litigated to a final resolution or judgment.
In Pennsylvania, res judicata, or claim preclusion, prevents a party from relitigating a claim that has been previously adjudicated by a competent court and has reached a final judgment. This means that if a court has made a final decision on a matter, the same parties cannot bring a lawsuit on the same claim again. Issue preclusion, also known as collateral estoppel, bars the relitigation of factual or legal issues that were already decided in a previous final judgment, even if the current lawsuit is based on a different claim. These doctrines are intended to promote judicial efficiency, respect court decisions, and protect parties from the burden of multiple lawsuits on the same matter. Both federal and state courts in Pennsylvania adhere to these principles, which are grounded in common law and have been affirmed by state case law.