A directed verdict is a procedure used by judges during trial to dismiss one or more claims when the party with the burden of proof (plaintiff) has failed to introduce evidence that is sufficient for a reasonable jury to find in favor of the party with the burden of proof. A directed verdict is like a summary judgment, but happens during trial rather than before trial.
In Vermont, a directed verdict, which is formally known as a judgment as a matter of law, is a ruling by the court during a jury trial. It occurs when the judge concludes that no reasonable jury could reach a decision to the contrary. This can happen if the plaintiff (the party with the burden of proof) has presented evidence that is insufficient to support a legal claim. In such cases, the judge may direct a verdict without sending the case to the jury for deliberation. This procedural action is governed by the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically Rule 50. It is similar to a summary judgment, which is a pre-trial determination that there are no factual issues to be tried and no need for a trial. However, a directed verdict is distinct in that it is issued after the trial has begun and the plaintiff has presented their case, but before the case is submitted to the jury for a verdict.