A directed verdict is a procedure used by judges during trial to dismiss one or more claims when the party with the burden of proof (plaintiff) has failed to introduce evidence that is sufficient for a reasonable jury to find in favor of the party with the burden of proof. A directed verdict is like a summary judgment, but happens during trial rather than before trial.
In Rhode Island, a directed verdict is a legal ruling made by a judge during a jury trial, typically upon a motion by the defendant. This occurs when the judge determines that the plaintiff, who carries the burden of proof, has presented evidence that is insufficient to warrant a jury decision in their favor. The standard for granting a directed verdict is whether the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, is such that reasonable minds could not differ on the outcome. If the evidence does not meet this threshold, the judge may direct a verdict without sending the case to the jury for deliberation. This procedural action is governed by Rule 50 of the Rhode Island Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure. It is similar to a summary judgment, which is a pre-trial determination that no factual issues exist to be tried, but a directed verdict occurs after the presentation of evidence at trial.