A directed verdict is a procedure used by judges during trial to dismiss one or more claims when the party with the burden of proof (plaintiff) has failed to introduce evidence that is sufficient for a reasonable jury to find in favor of the party with the burden of proof. A directed verdict is like a summary judgment, but happens during trial rather than before trial.
In New York, a directed verdict, known as a 'judgment as a matter of law' in federal courts, is a ruling by a judge during a jury trial, typically upon a motion by the defendant. This occurs after the plaintiff has presented their case and the judge determines that no reasonable jury could find in the plaintiff's favor based on the evidence presented. Under New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) Section 4401, a party may move for a directed verdict at the close of the opposing party's evidence. The standard for granting a directed verdict is whether there is any valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could possibly lead rational people to the conclusion reached by the jury on the basis of the evidence presented at trial. If the evidence so overwhelmingly favors the defendant that no contrary verdict could stand, a directed verdict may be issued, effectively ending that part of the case without it going to the jury for deliberation.