Select your state

Civil procedure

directed verdict

A directed verdict is a procedure used by judges during trial to dismiss one or more claims when the party with the burden of proof (plaintiff) has failed to introduce evidence that is sufficient for a reasonable jury to find in favor of the party with the burden of proof. A directed verdict is like a summary judgment, but happens during trial rather than before trial.

In North Carolina, a directed verdict is a ruling by the court during a jury trial, typically requested by the defendant, where the judge determines that the plaintiff has not presented sufficient evidence to reasonably support their claim. This procedure is governed by Rule 50 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. If, after considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, the judge concludes that a reasonable jury could only find for the moving party, the judge may grant a directed verdict and dismiss the claim without it going to the jury for deliberation. This is a critical tool used to prevent cases without legal merit from taking up the time of the court and the jury. It is similar to a summary judgment, which is decided before a trial begins, but a directed verdict occurs after the plaintiff has presented their case and before the case is submitted to the jury for a verdict.

Legal Articles

State Statutes

Individual & Family Legal Plan

As a LegalFix member, you'll get expert legal services from a local law firm that treats you like an important client. Don't wait—be prepared for life's inevitable legal challenges starting today. And ask your employer, credit union, or membership group about preferred pricing opportunities.

Civil procedure

directed verdict

Individual & Family Legal Plan

Articles

North-Carolina State Code

North-Carolina State Code

Articles

Civil procedure

directed verdict