A directed verdict is a procedure used by judges during trial to dismiss one or more claims when the party with the burden of proof (plaintiff) has failed to introduce evidence that is sufficient for a reasonable jury to find in favor of the party with the burden of proof. A directed verdict is like a summary judgment, but happens during trial rather than before trial.
In Illinois, a directed verdict is a ruling by the court during a jury trial, typically requested by the defense, where the judge determines that the plaintiff (or party with the burden of proof) has not presented legally sufficient evidence to support a claim or claims, such that no reasonable jury could find in their favor. This procedural move occurs after the plaintiff has presented all of their evidence but before the case is submitted to the jury for deliberation. The legal standard for a directed verdict in Illinois is governed by state case law and statutes, specifically the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure. If the motion for a directed verdict is granted, the claim or claims are dismissed without being decided by the jury. It is similar to a summary judgment, which is a pre-trial judgment that can be granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. However, a directed verdict is distinct in that it is sought during the trial after the plaintiff has had the opportunity to present their case.