A directed verdict is a procedure used by judges during trial to dismiss one or more claims when the party with the burden of proof (plaintiff) has failed to introduce evidence that is sufficient for a reasonable jury to find in favor of the party with the burden of proof. A directed verdict is like a summary judgment, but happens during trial rather than before trial.
In Connecticut, a directed verdict, known as a judgment as a matter of law in federal courts, is a ruling by a judge during a jury trial, typically upon a motion by the defendant. This occurs after the plaintiff has presented their case but before the case is submitted to the jury. The judge may grant a directed verdict if there is a lack of evidence on a necessary element of the plaintiff's claim, making it such that no reasonable jury could find in the plaintiff's favor. The standard for granting a directed verdict is that, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, there can be only one reasonable conclusion as to the verdict. If the motion for a directed verdict is denied, the trial proceeds, and the defense presents its case. Directed verdicts are governed by Connecticut state statutes and case law, which outline the specific procedures and standards for judges to follow when considering such motions.