An agreed case is a procedure that can be used in rare situations in which the parties to a lawsuit agree on the facts and disagree on the relevant law as applied to the facts. In such a case the parties stipulate to the facts, file a narrative statement of the agreed facts, and submit the case to the court for a ruling.
If a case submitted on an agreed statement of facts is appealed, the narrative statement of facts stipulated to by the parties is filed with the appellate court (often the court of appeals) rather than the trial court record (a transcript of the trial that includes witness testimony and documents admitted in evidence).
In Utah, an agreed case is a legal procedure where all parties involved in a lawsuit concur on the factual aspects of the case but differ on the legal implications of those facts. This process allows the parties to bypass the traditional trial process by submitting a stipulated narrative statement of the agreed facts directly to the court for a decision on the legal issues. This is particularly useful in situations where the dispute is primarily about the interpretation or application of the law rather than the facts of the case. When such a case is appealed, the agreed statement of facts is presented to the appellate court, which may be the Utah Court of Appeals, instead of the usual trial court record. This agreed statement serves as the factual basis for the appellate court's review of the legal issues.