State and federal courts have recognized that individuals acting in a legislative capacity are immune from liability for those actions. The legislative immunity doctrine is deeply embedded in Anglo American law, serving to encourage free and open debate.

The legislative immunity doctrine is not intended to protect individual legislators, but instead serves the public's interests. Because the immunity doctrine serves important public purposes, courts have affirmed that the doctrine generally shields legislative actors not only from liability, but also from being required to testify about their legislative activities.

The threat of liability can create perverse incentives that operate to inhibit officials in the proper performance of their duties. In many contexts, government officials are expected to make decisions that are impartial or imaginative, and that above all are informed by considerations other than the personal interests of the decisionmaker.

Because government officials are engaged by definition in governing, their decisions will often have adverse effects on other persons. When officials are threatened with personal liability for acts taken pursuant to their official duties, they may well be induced to act with an excess of caution or otherwise to skew their decisions in ways that result in less than full fidelity to the objective and independent criteria that ought to guide their conduct.

Courts have extended the legislative immunity doctrine beyond federal and state legislators to other individuals performing legitimate legislative functions. And when a person acts as a legislator, legislative immunity extends to the legislator's aides because their assistance is so critical to the legislator's performance that they must be treated as the latter's alter egos to avoid thwarting the purposes legislative immunity furthers.

In New Jersey, as in other states, the legislative immunity doctrine is recognized by both state and federal courts as a protection for individuals acting in a legislative capacity. This doctrine is rooted in the principle of encouraging free and open debate within legislative bodies and is designed to serve the public interest rather than individual legislators. Legislative immunity shields these actors not only from liability but also from the compulsion to testify about their legislative activities. The rationale behind this immunity is to prevent the deterrence of officials from performing their duties effectively due to the fear of personal liability. Decisions made by government officials can have negative impacts on others, and without immunity, there is a risk that officials might act too cautiously or with bias towards personal interests, rather than making decisions based on objective and independent criteria. New Jersey courts, in line with federal precedent, have extended legislative immunity to include not just elected legislators but also other individuals who perform legitimate legislative functions, as well as legislative aides, recognizing their integral role in the legislative process. This extension ensures that the legislative process is not hindered by potential litigation or liability concerns.