(1) (a) An allegation by the receiver of improper or fraudulent conduct against a person may not be the basis of a defense to the enforcement of a contractual obligation owed to the insurer by a third party. (b) Notwithstanding Subsection (1)(a), a third party described in this Subsection (1) is not barred by this section from seeking to establish independently as a defense that the conduct is materially and substantially related to the contractual obligation for which enforcement is sought.

(a) An allegation by the receiver of improper or fraudulent conduct against a person may not be the basis of a defense to the enforcement of a contractual obligation owed to the insurer by a third party.

(b) Notwithstanding Subsection (1)(a), a third party described in this Subsection (1) is not barred by this section from seeking to establish independently as a defense that the conduct is materially and substantially related to the contractual obligation for which enforcement is sought.

(2) (a) Subject to Subsection (2)(b), a prior wrongful or negligent action of any present or former officer, manager, director, trustee, owner, employee, or agent of the insurer may not be asserted as a defense to a claim by the receiver: (i) under a theory of: (A) estoppel; (B) comparative fault; (C) intervening cause; (D) proximate cause; (E) reliance; or (F) mitigation of damages; or (ii) otherwise. (b) Notwithstanding Subsection (2)(a): (i) the affirmative defense of fraud in the inducement may be asserted against the receiver in a claim based on a contract; and (ii) a principal under a surety bond or a surety undertaking is entitled to credit against any reimbursement obligation to the receiver for the value of any property pledged to secure the reimbursement obligation to the extent that: (A) the receiver has possession or control of the property; or (B) the insurer or its agents misappropriated, including commingling, the property. (c) Evidence of fraud in the inducement is admissible only if it is contained in the records of the insurer.

(a) Subject to Subsection (2)(b), a prior wrongful or negligent action of any present or former officer, manager, director, trustee, owner, employee, or agent of the insurer may not be asserted as a defense to a claim by the receiver: (i) under a theory of: (A) estoppel; (B) comparative fault; (C) intervening cause; (D) proximate cause; (E) reliance; or (F) mitigation of damages; or (ii) otherwise.

(i) under a theory of: (A) estoppel; (B) comparative fault; (C) intervening cause; (D) proximate cause; (E) reliance; or (F) mitigation of damages; or

(A) estoppel;

(B) comparative fault;

(C) intervening cause;

(D) proximate cause;

(E) reliance; or

(F) mitigation of damages; or

(ii) otherwise.

(b) Notwithstanding Subsection (2)(a): (i) the affirmative defense of fraud in the inducement may be asserted against the receiver in a claim based on a contract; and (ii) a principal under a surety bond or a surety undertaking is entitled to credit against any reimbursement obligation to the receiver for the value of any property pledged to secure the reimbursement obligation to the extent that: (A) the receiver has possession or control of the property; or (B) the insurer or its agents misappropriated, including commingling, the property.

(i) the affirmative defense of fraud in the inducement may be asserted against the receiver in a claim based on a contract; and

(ii) a principal under a surety bond or a surety undertaking is entitled to credit against any reimbursement obligation to the receiver for the value of any property pledged to secure the reimbursement obligation to the extent that: (A) the receiver has possession or control of the property; or (B) the insurer or its agents misappropriated, including commingling, the property.

(A) the receiver has possession or control of the property; or

(B) the insurer or its agents misappropriated, including commingling, the property.

(c) Evidence of fraud in the inducement is admissible only if it is contained in the records of the insurer.

(3) Action or inaction by an insurance regulatory authority may not be asserted as a defense to a claim by the receiver.

(4) (a) Subject to Subsection (4)(b), a judgment or order entered against an insured or the insurer in contravention of a stay or injunction under this chapter, or at any time by default or collusion, may not be considered as evidence of liability or of the quantum of damages in adjudicating claims filed in the estate arising out of the subject matter of the judgment or order. (b) Subsection (4)(a) does not apply to an affected guaranty association's claim for amounts paid on a settlement or judgment in pursuit of the affected guaranty association's statutory obligations.

(a) Subject to Subsection (4)(b), a judgment or order entered against an insured or the insurer in contravention of a stay or injunction under this chapter, or at any time by default or collusion, may not be considered as evidence of liability or of the quantum of damages in adjudicating claims filed in the estate arising out of the subject matter of the judgment or order.

(b) Subsection (4)(a) does not apply to an affected guaranty association's claim for amounts paid on a settlement or judgment in pursuit of the affected guaranty association's statutory obligations.

(5) (a) Subject to Subsection (5)(b), the following do not affect the amount that a receiver may recover from a third party, regardless of any provision in an agreement to the contrary: (i) the insurer's insolvency; or (ii) the insurer's or receiver's failure to pay all or a portion of an amount or a claim to the third party. (b) If an agreement between the insurer and a third party requires a payment by the insurer before the insurer may recover from the third party, the amount the receiver may recover from the third party under Subsection (5)(a) is limited to an amount equal to the greater of: (i) the amount paid by the insurer or by another person on behalf of the insurer to the third party; or (ii) the amount allowed as a claim for payment under: (A) an approved report described in Section 31A-27a-608; (B) an order of the receivership court; or (C) a plan of rehabilitation.

(a) Subject to Subsection (5)(b), the following do not affect the amount that a receiver may recover from a third party, regardless of any provision in an agreement to the contrary: (i) the insurer's insolvency; or (ii) the insurer's or receiver's failure to pay all or a portion of an amount or a claim to the third party.

(i) the insurer's insolvency; or

(ii) the insurer's or receiver's failure to pay all or a portion of an amount or a claim to the third party.

(b) If an agreement between the insurer and a third party requires a payment by the insurer before the insurer may recover from the third party, the amount the receiver may recover from the third party under Subsection (5)(a) is limited to an amount equal to the greater of: (i) the amount paid by the insurer or by another person on behalf of the insurer to the third party; or (ii) the amount allowed as a claim for payment under: (A) an approved report described in Section 31A-27a-608; (B) an order of the receivership court; or (C) a plan of rehabilitation.

(i) the amount paid by the insurer or by another person on behalf of the insurer to the third party; or

(ii) the amount allowed as a claim for payment under: (A) an approved report described in Section 31A-27a-608; (B) an order of the receivership court; or (C) a plan of rehabilitation.

(A) an approved report described in Section 31A-27a-608;

(B) an order of the receivership court; or

(C) a plan of rehabilitation.

(6) The receiver may not be considered a governmental entity for the purposes of any state law awarding fees to a litigant who prevails against a governmental entity.