(a) Collateral counsel.--Immediately after the formal imposition of sentence on all charges or within 30 days of the verdict of the death penalty, whichever occurs later, the court shall appoint new counsel for the purposes of collateral review, unless:
(1) the petitioner has elected to proceed pro se and the court finds, after a colloquy on the record, that the petitioner's election is knowing, intelligent and voluntary; or
(2) the petitioner retains counsel for the unitary review proceeding.
(b) Prior attorney.--No petitioner may be represented on collateral review, either in the trial court or on appeal, by an attorney, whether retained or appointed, who has represented the petitioner at any other stage of the proceedings, including direct appeal, unless the court finds, after a colloquy on the record, that the petitioner has knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to challenge the effectiveness of that attorney's representation.
(c) Standards for appointment of counsel.--The Supreme Court shall adopt standards for the appointment of counsel in capital cases. These standards shall apply for the appointment of trial counsel, collateral review counsel and appellate counsel. When adopting the standards, the Supreme Court shall consider, where practicable, the following criteria:
(1) Counsel is admitted to practice in Pennsylvania.
(2) Counsel is an experienced and active trial practitioner with at least five years' litigation experience in the field of criminal law.
(3) Counsel has prior experience as counsel in a specified number of trials or other relevant proceedings.
(4) Counsel is familiar with the practice and procedure of the appropriate courts, including Federal courts of the jurisdiction.
(5) Counsel has demonstrated the necessary proficiency and commitment which exemplify the quality of representation appropriate to capital cases.
(6) Local practice for the appointment of counsel in capital cases.
Absent standards established under this subsection, the court may appoint such counsel as it deems qualified, in accordance with any local rules or practices. The existence or applicability of or failure to comply with such standards shall not provide a basis for relief.
Suspension by Court Order. Section 9572 was suspended August 11, 1997, S.Ct. Order.
Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.
LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.
The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.
You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.
The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.
Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.