All persons interested in a common ditch or acequia, be they owners or lessees, shall labor thereon in proportion to their land. It is their duty when called upon by the mayordomo to assist him in stopping breaks in, or removing obstructions from, any such common ditch or acequia, regardless of whether or not they have performed their annual labor thereupon, and failure to respond to such call is a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof the defendant shall be fined in a sum not less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) nor more than fifty dollars ($50.00), and shall be denied the use of waters of the ditch or acequia until the fine and costs are paid.
History: Laws 1851-1852, p. 189, § 5; C.L. 1865, ch. 1, § 5; C.L. 1884, § 35; C.L. 1897, § 32; Laws 1903, ch. 44, § 4; Code 1915, § 5759; C.S. 1929, § 151-429; 1941 Comp., § 77-1430; 1953 Comp., § 75-14-31; Laws 1977, ch. 184, § 4.
Cross references. — For other sanctions for not working, see 73-2-25 and 73-2-26 NMSA 1978.
For penalty for abandoning work, see 73-2-37 NMSA 1978.
For provisions applicable to certain counties, see 73-3-5 to 73-3-7 NMSA 1978.
The 1977 amendment substituted the present section heading for "Labor to be in proportion to land - Additional labor - Penalty for failure to respond - Use of water denied" and, in the last sentence, substituted "It is" for "And it shall be" at the beginning, substituted "is" for "shall be deemed" preceding "a misdemeanor," substituted "twenty-five dollars ($25.00) nor more than fifty dollars ($50.00)" for "five dollars ($5.00) nor more than fifteen dollars ($15.00)," inserted "or acequia" following "ditch" near the end of the sentence and made other minor changes in phraseology and punctuation.
Domestic use may not be considered. — The domestic use is so small, when compared to the other use to which water is applied by the appropriator, that the legislature possibly did not take such use into consideration in regulating labor to be performed upon the ditches. State ex rel. Cmty. Ditches v. Tularosa Cmty. Ditch, 1914-NMSC-069, 19 N.M. 352, 143 P. 207.
Bylaw invalid. — Bylaw of ditch company which provides that those farther from the inlet contribute a greater portion for repairs than those nearer is invalid. State ex rel. Black v. Aztec Ditch Co., 1919-NMSC-057, 25 N.M. 590, 185 P. 549.
Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.
LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.
The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.
You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.
The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.
Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.