Sections 61-1-1 through 61-1-31 NMSA 1978 may be cited as the "Uniform Licensing Act".

History: 1953 Comp., § 67-26-1, enacted by Laws 1957, ch. 247, § 1; 1971, ch. 54, § 1.

Compiler's notes. — Following the recompilation of NMSA in 1978, this section defined the Uniform Licensing Act as "Sections 61-1-1 through 61-1-31 NMSA 1978". Laws 1981, ch. 349, §§ 22 and 23 added 61-1-32 and 61-1-33 NMSA 1978, but did not specifically add those sections to the Uniform Licensing Act.

Laws 2002, ch. 83, §§ 2 to 4 purported to enact new sections under the Uniform Licensing Act, but those sections were relocated to appear following the State Civil Emergency Preparedness Act, which is compiled as 12-10-1 to 12-10-10 NMSA 1978.

Cross references. — For State Rules Act, see 14-4-1 NMSA 1978 et seq.

For criminal offender employment, see 28-2-1 NMSA 1978.

For the Parental Responsibility Act, see 40-5A-1 NMSA 1978 et seq.

Due process. — A regulation of the New Mexico board of psychologist examiners requiring an oral examination for reinstatement of a retiree's license was rationally related to a legitimate governmental purpose; however, the examination might not comply with due process, and, thus, an applicant for reinstatement was entitled to a hearing on the rational justification for the oral examination requirement. Mills v. N.M. State Bd. of Psychologist Exam'rs, 1997-NMSC-028, 123 N.M. 421, 941 P.2d 502.

Appeals. — Because the Uniform Licensing Act did not provide a retired psychologist with a basis for appealing a decision of the New Mexico board of psychologist examiners to require an oral examination for reinstatement of her license, she could request a writ of certiorari to obtain review of the board's alleged due process violations. Mills v. N.M. State Bd. of Psychologist Exam'rs, 1997-NMSC-028, 123 N.M. 421, 941 P.2d 502.

Revocation must be based on substantial evidence. — In administrative adjudications where a person's livelihood (a property right) is at stake, any action depriving a person of that property must be based upon such substantial evidence as would support a verdict in a court of law. Young v. Board of Pharmacy, 1969-NMSC-168, 81 N.M. 5, 462 P.2d 139.

Naked hearsay insufficient. — In proceedings to revoke a license to conduct a business or profession, where, by law, the licensee is entitled to a hearing before the licensing authority, revocation based solely upon hearsay evidence is unwarranted. Young v. Board of Pharmacy, 1969-NMSC-168, 81 N.M. 5, 462 P.2d 139.

License not revocable on grounds for original denial. — An administrative agency, having once issued a license to an applicant who has made full disclosure of all pertinent facts, may not revoke that same license for reasons that would not have permitted issuance of the license in the first instance. Roberts v. State Bd. of Embalmers & Funeral Dirs., 1967-NMSC-257, 78 N.M. 536, 434 P.2d 61.

Barring fraud and misrepresentation and the existence of statutory authority, state may not revoke the license issued previously to party for the reason that party did not have two years of college training required by the statute when, in fact, at the time appellant granted the license to party, state knew that appellee did not have said college work but, nevertheless, proceeded to grant the license under a policy which, in effect, eliminated the college requirement. Roberts v. State Bd. of Embalmers & Funeral Dirs., 1967-NMSC-257, 78 N.M. 536, 434 P.2d 61.

Specification of "unprofessional conduct" not required. — A board may suspend or revoke a license to practice a profession for "unprofessional conduct" without its being required to first specify by regulation or rule exactly what acts may be so considered. Young v. Board of Pharmacy, 1969-NMSC-168, 81 N.M. 5, 462 P.2d 139.

Preexisting account not required to receive funds. — No law or regulation of the New Mexico real estate commission requires a custodial, trust or escrow account prior to the receipt of funds appropriate for deposit in such account. McCaughtry v. N.M. Real Estate Comm'n, 1970-NMSC-143, 82 N.M. 116, 477 P.2d 292.

Law reviews. — For note, "Police Power and the Design of Buildings," see 5 Nat. Res. J. 122 (1965).

For article, "An Administrative Procedure Act for New Mexico," see 8 Nat. Res. J. 114 (1968).

Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 58 Am. Jur. 2d Occupations, Trades, and Professions §§ 1 to 10.

Single or isolated transactions as falling within provisions of commercial or occupational licensing requirements, 93 A.L.R.2d 90.

Physician's or other healer's conduct, or conviction of offense, not directly related to medical practice, as ground for disciplinary action, 34 A.L.R.4th 609.

Physician's or other healer's conduct in connection with defense of or resistance to malpractice action as ground for revocation of license or other disciplinary action, 44 A.L.R.4th 248.

Failure of building and construction artisan or contractor to procure business or occupational license as affecting enforceability of contract or right to recover for work done - modern cases, 44 A.L.R.4th 271.

Validity of state or municipal tax or license fee upon occupation of practicing law, 50 A.L.R.4th 467.