No claim for compensation under the Workers' Compensation Act, as it now provides or as it may hereafter be amended, shall be barred prior to the filing of such report or within thirty days thereafter, but this section does not shorten the time now provided for filing claims with the director.
History: Laws 1937, ch. 92, § 15; 1941 Comp., § 57-928; 1953 Comp., § 59-10-28; Laws 1986, ch. 22, § 21; 1989, ch. 263, § 35.
Employer's failure to file injury report. — Where employer employed worker for one day; worker's injuries were severe enough that if employment had lasted longer than one day, worker would have lost more than seven days of work; employer did not file an injury report required by Section 52-1-58(A) NMSA 1978; employer denied workers' compensation benefits to worker; and worker filed a claim for workers' compensation with the workers' compensation administration nineteen months after employer denied worker's claim for benefits, worker's claim was not barred by statute of limitations. Nelson v. Homier Distrib. Co., Inc., 2009-NMCA-125, 147 N.M. 318, 222 P.3d 690.
The word "barred" in the section does not apply to laches and the legislative history shows that this section was enacted in connection with the limitation period. Anaya v. City of Santa Fe, 1969-NMSC-025, 80 N.M. 54, 451 P.2d 303.
Workman (Worker) cannot avoid limitations because employer failed to file report. — A workman (worker) failing to file his claim in court within the statutory period after learning of the extent and seriousness of his disability cannot avoid the bar of limitations by asserting that the employer failed to file with the labor commissioner (now director of the labor and industrial division) a report concerning a compensable injury where the employer had no reason to believe that a compensable injury had occurred. Sanchez v. Bernalillo Cnty., 1953-NMSC-038, 57 N.M. 217, 257 P.2d 909.
Claim for death benefits in the case of a hospital nurse who died of a heart attack was not time barred, where the hospital had actual notice of the compensable injury, yet failed to file a written report as required. Herman v. Miners' Hosp., 1991-NMSC-021, 111 N.M. 550, 807 P.2d 734.
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — Employer's tort liability to worker for concealing workplace hazard or nature or extent of injury, 9 A.L.R.4th 778.
100 C.J.S. Workmen's Compensation § 441.
Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.
LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.
The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.
You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.
The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.
Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.