A. Except as provided in Subsection B of this section, no infrastructure development zone may be organized wholly or partly within an existing special district or infrastructure development zone that provides the same service; provided that nothing in this subsection shall prevent an infrastructure development zone that provides different services from organizing wholly or partly within an existing special district or infrastructure development zone.
B. An overlapping district may be authorized to provide the same service as the existing special district or infrastructure development zone that the overlapping district overlaps or will overlap if:
(1) where the service plan of the overlapping district is subject to approval by a governing body, the governing body having jurisdiction over the overlapping territory approves by resolution the inclusion of the service as part of the service plan of the overlapping district;
(2) the improvements or facilities to be financed, established or operated by the overlapping district for the provision of the same service as the existing special district or infrastructure development zone do not duplicate or interfere with any other improvements or facilities already constructed or planned to be constructed within the portion of the existing special district or infrastructure development zone that the overlapping district overlaps or will overlap; and
(3) the board of directors of any special district or infrastructure development zone authorized to provide a service within the boundaries of the overlapping area consents to the overlapping district providing the same service.
C. As used in this section:
(1) "overlapping district" means a new or existing special district or infrastructure development zone located wholly or partly within an existing special district or infrastructure development zone; and
(2) "special district" means any single or multipurpose district organized or that may be organized as a local public body of this state for the purpose of constructing and furnishing any urban-oriented service that another political subdivision of the state is authorized to perform.
History: Laws 2009, ch. 136, § 12.
Effective dates. — Laws 2009, ch. 136 contained no effective date provision, but, pursuant to N.M. Const., art. IV, § 23, was effective June 19, 2009, 90 days after the adjournment of the legislature.
Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.
LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.
The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.
You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.
The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.
Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.