A. A formal proceeding for adjudication regarding the priority or qualification of one who is an applicant for appointment as personal representative, or of one who previously has been appointed personal representative in informal proceedings, if an issue concerning the testacy of the decedent is or may be involved, is governed by Section 3-402 [45-3-402 NMSA 1978], as well as by this section. In other cases, the petition shall contain or adopt the statements required by Subsection A of Section 3-301 [45-3-301 NMSA 1978] and describe the question relating to priority or qualification of the personal representative which is to be resolved. If the proceeding precedes any appointment of a personal representative, it shall stay any pending informal appointment proceedings as well as any commenced thereafter. If the proceeding is commenced after appointment, the previously-appointed personal representative, after receipt of notice thereof, shall refrain from exercising any power of administration except as necessary to preserve the estate or unless the district court orders otherwise.
B. After notice to interested persons, including all persons interested in the administration of the estate as successors under the applicable assumption concerning testacy, any previously-appointed personal representative, and any person having or claiming priority for appointment as personal representative, the district court shall determine who is entitled to appointment under Section 3-203 [45-3-203 NMSA 1978], make a proper appointment and, if appropriate, terminate any prior appointment found to have been improper as provided in cases of removal under Section 3-611 [45-3-611 NMSA 1978].
History: 1953 Comp., § 32A-3-414, enacted by Laws 1975, ch. 257, § 3-414.
Official comments. — See Commissioners on Uniform State Law official comment to 3-414 UPC.
Limitations on informally appointed personal representative. — Once the district court denied a petition for formal appointment of the decedent's child as personal representative and ruled that the decedent's spouse should continue as personal representative, the limitation on the decedent's spouse's power as informally appointed personal representative in 45-3-414A NMSA 1978 no longer applied. In re Estate of Lopez, 1987-NMCA-087, 106 N.M. 157, 740 P.2d 707.
Law reviews. — For article, "The Use of Revocable Inter Vivos Trusts in Estate Planning," see 1 N.M.L. Rev. 143 (1971).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 33 C.J.S. Executors and Administrators § 13.
Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.
LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.
The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.
You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.
The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.
Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.