A. Upon the defendant's motion before trial, the district court shall determine the truth of the facts stated in the plaintiff's affidavit at a hearing, to be held without delay. If the plaintiff fails to prove the truth of the facts stated, the writ shall be dissolved, the plaintiff shall be ordered to return the property to the defendant and an order shall be entered for the defendant against the plaintiff and his sureties for the attorney's fees incurred in the dissolution of the writ and for double damages for the use of the property from the time of its delivery to the plaintiff.
B. If the writ of replevin is dissolved, the action shall then proceed as if no writ had been issued.
History: 1953 Comp., § 22-17-18.1, enacted by Laws 1975, ch. 249, § 7.
Purpose of section. — The legislature, in enacting this section, intended to compensate a defendant in replevin for defending an action that is groundless, whether or not the defendant's property has actually been seized by the sheriff. Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. Layton, 1989-NMSC-006, 108 N.M. 171, 769 P.2d 84.
Measure of damages recoverable by debtor for creditor's wrongful replevin is double damages for the use (or reasonable rental value) of property wrongfully replevied, for period of time from its wrongful taking to its tendered return. First Nat'l Bank v. Southwest Yacht & Marine Supply Corp., 1984-NMSC-075, 101 N.M. 431, 684 P.2d 517.
Effect of failure to accept return of property. — By failing to accept plaintiff's tender to return the property, defendant limits the damages recoverable to those suffered during the period from the wrongful taking to the date of the tender. First Nat'l Bank v. Southwest Yacht & Marine Supply Corp., 1984-NMSC-075, 101 N.M. 431, 684 P.2d 517.
Extent of recovery of attorney fees. — Defendant may only recover reasonable attorney fees which it may have incurred in the dissolution of the wrongfully issued writ of replevin; no attorney fees are recoverable for otherwise defending the replevin action. First Nat'l Bank v. Southwest Yacht & Marine Supply Corp., 1984-NMSC-075, 101 N.M. 431, 684 P.2d 517.
This section and Section 42-8-11 NMSA 1978 not mutually exclusive. — This section and Section 42-8-11 NMSA 1978, providing for a return of property and the payment of damages upon failure of plaintiff to prosecute his case, are not mutually exclusive. First Nat'l Bank v. Southwest Yacht & Marine Supply Corp., 1984-NMSC-075, 101 N.M. 431, 684 P.2d 517.
Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.
LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.
The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.
You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.
The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.
Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.