LegalFix

Section 40-11A-606 - No limitation; child having no presumed, acknowledged or adjudicated father.

NM Stat § 40-11A-606 (2019) (N/A)
Copy with citation
Copy as parenthetical citation

A. A proceeding to adjudicate the parentage of a child having no presumed, acknowledged or adjudicated father may be commenced by the child at any time, even after:

(1) the child becomes an adult; or

(2) an earlier proceeding to adjudicate paternity has been dismissed based on the application of a statute of limitation then in effect.

B. A proceeding to adjudicate child support pursuant to Subsection A of this section is limited by Sections 6-607 and 6-636 of the New Mexico Uniform Parentage Act.

History: Laws 2009, ch. 215, § 6-606.

Effective dates. — Laws 2009, ch. 215, § 20 made the New Mexico Uniform Parentage Act effective January 1, 2010.

Adult child. — Twenty-year-old child was "interested party" under 40-11-7 NMSA 1978, and therefore entitled to bring action for paternity and past child support under the Uniform Parentage Act. State ex rel. Salazar v. Roybal, 1998-NMCA-093, 125 N.M. 471, 963 P.2d 548, cert. denied, 125 N.M. 322, 961 P.2d 167.

This article authorizes an adult daughter to pursue a cause of action for retroactive child support against her alleged father, in conjunction with a paternity action, prior to her twenty-first birthday. Tedford v. Gregory, 1998-NMCA-067, 125 N.M. 206, 959 P.2d 540, cert. denied, 125 N.M. 147, 958 P.2d 105.

Suit need not commence before putative father's death. — Statute does not require children who were fathered outside of marriage to bring support action before their father died in order to make support claims against the estate. Kesterson v. DeLara, 2002-NMCA-004, 131 N.M. 430, 38 P.3d 198, cert. denied, 131 N.M. 564, 40 P.3d 1008.

Collateral estoppel. — Daughter's claim for paternity and retroactive child support was not barred by collateral estoppel, as she was neither a party to the divorce proceeding nor in privity with her mother as to the original decree; however, mother's husband was barred by collateral estoppel from asserting a claim for reimbursement of child support expenses. Tedford v. Gregory, 1998-NMCA-067, 125 N.M. 206, 959 P.2d 540, cert. denied, 125 N.M. 147, 958 P.2d 105.

Law reviews. — Annual Survey of New Mexico Family Law, see 17 N.M.L. Rev. 291 (1987).

LegalFix

Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.

LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.

The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.

You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.

The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.

Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

We have updated our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures.
Section 40-11A-606 - No limitation; child having no presumed, acknowledged or adjudicated father.