LegalFix

Section 39-4-15 - [Pleading claim of exemption.]

NM Stat § 39-4-15 (2019) (N/A)
Copy with citation
Copy as parenthetical citation

The defendant, if he desires to claim such real estate or any part thereof as an exemption allowed by law, shall set up his claim of exemption by answer in such foreclosure suit.

History: Laws 1933, ch. 7, § 3; 1941 Comp., § 21-116; 1953 Comp., § 24-1-24.

Waiver of claim of exemption. — The defendant waives his claim of exemption in a foreclosure action when the defendant fails to appeal the denial of his claim of exemption within thirty days after a foreclosure decree is entered. Grygorwicz v. Trujillo, 2008-NMCA-040, 143 N.M. 704, 181 P.3d 696, rev'd, 2007-NMSC-009, 145 N.M. 650, 203 P.3d 865.

Claim of exemptions. — The defendant's appeal was timely under Rule 12-201(D) NMRA because defendant's motion for claim of exemptions on execution, filed subsequent to the final foreclosure decree, tolled the time for filing a notice of appeal, and defendant properly appealed within thirty days from the express denial of that motion and did not waive the right to a homestead exemption by failing to file an appeal within thirty days of the foreclosure decree. Grygorwicz v. Trujillo, 2009-NMSC-009, 145 N.M. 650, 203 P.3d 865.

Failure to claim exemption. — Where homestead exemption had not been claimed in trial court, it would not be considered by appellate court on review. Chavez v. Chavez, 1952-NMSC-050, 56 N.M. 393, 244 P.2d 781.

Mortgagors were not entitled to a homestead exemption against junior judgment lienholders when they had an opportunity to advance claims for such exemption in their answers to the cross claims which sought foreclosure of the liens, but failed to do so, and thereby failed to comply with this section. Speckner v. Riebold, 1974-NMSC-029, 86 N.M. 275, 523 P.2d 10.

To be entitled to a homestead exemption under this section and 42-10-9 NMSA 1978 (prior to the 1979 amendment of 42-10-9 NMSA 1978), a party had to claim the exemption in his answer to a foreclosure action; otherwise, he could not claim it. US Life Title Ins. Co. v. Romero, 1982-NMCA-068, 98 N.M. 699, 652 P.2d 249, cert. denied, 98 N.M. 336, 648 P.2d 794.

LegalFix

Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.

LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.

The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.

You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.

The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.

Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

We have updated our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures.
Section 39-4-15 - [Pleading claim of exemption.]