LegalFix

Section 37-1-17 - [Other statutes prescribing limitations unaffected.]

NM Stat § 37-1-17 (2019) (N/A)
Copy with citation
Copy as parenthetical citation

None of the provisions of this chapter shall apply to any action or suit which, by any particular statute of this state, is limited to be commenced within a different time, nor shall this chapter be construed to repeal any existing statute of the state which provides a limitation of any action; but in such cases the limitation shall be as provided by such statutes.

History: Laws 1880, ch. 5, § 16; C.L. 1884, § 1876; C.L. 1897, § 2929; Code 1915, § 3359; C.S. 1929, § 83-114; 1941 Comp., § 27-116; 1953 Comp., § 23-1-17.

Bracketed material. — The bracketed material was inserted by the compiler and is not part of the law.

Compiler's notes. — The compilers of the 1915 Code substituted "preceding provisions of this chapter" for "provisions of this act".

The words "this chapter" refer to ch. 68 of the 1915 Code, which is compiled as 37-1-1 to 37-1-4, 37-1-6 to 37-1-19, 37-1-21, 37-1-22, 37-1-25, 37-1-26 NMSA 1978.

New remedy qualified by time limitation on exercise of right. — Where a statute grants a new remedy and at the same time places a limitation of time within which the person complaining must act, the limitation is a limitation of the right as well as the remedy and, in the absence of qualifying provisions or saving clauses, the party seeking to avail himself of the remedy must bring himself strictly within the limitations. Ortega v. Shube, 1979-NMCA-130, 93 N.M. 584, 603 P.2d 323, overruled on other grounds by Bracken v. Yates Petroleum Corp., 1988-NMSC-072, 107 N.M. 463, 760 P.2d 155.

Annexation. — Former statute limiting time for appeal by property owners from municipal resolution of annexation to 30-day period began to run upon the passage of the resolution, and action not brought within that period was barred. Leavell v. Town of Texico, 1957-NMSC-081, 63 N.M. 233, 316 P.2d 247.

Gaming statutes. — A demurrer to a counterclaim pleading a cause of action under the gaming statutes, which cause was barred by one-year statute of limitations, was properly sustained. Mann v. Gordon, 1910-NMSC-059, 15 N.M. 652, 110 P. 1043.

Suit against the state. — Section 37-1-14 NMSA 1978, which extends the statute of limitations period when the filing of a second suit is a continuation of a first suit, does not apply to breach of contract actions filed against the state which are governed by Section 37-1-23 NMSA 1978. Gathman-Matotan Architects & Planners, Inc. v. State, Dep't of Fin. & Admin., Prop. Control Div., 1990-NMSC-013, 109 N.M. 492, 787 P.2d 411.

Extensions for disability. — Section 37-1-10 NMSA 1978, extending period of limitations for minors and incapacitated persons, does not apply to actions for negligence against municipalities. Noriega v. City of Albuquerque, 1974-NMCA-040, 86 N.M. 294, 523 P.2d 29, cert. denied, 86 N.M. 281, 523 P.2d 16.

Wrongful Death Statute. — Section 37-1-10 NMSA 1978 is not applicable to wrongful death statute. Natseway v. Jojola, 1952-NMSC-104, 56 N.M. 793, 251 P.2d 274.

Tort Claims Act. — Section 37-1-14 NMSA 1978 does not apply to actions under Tort Claims Act, Article 4 of Chapter 41. Estate of Gutierrez v. Albuquerque Police Dep't, 1986-NMCA-023, 104 N.M. 111, 717 P.2d 87, cert. denied sub nom. Haney v. Albuquerque Police Dep't, 103 N.M. 798, 715 P.2d 71, overruled on other grounds by Bracken v. Yates Petroleum Corp., 1988-NMSC-072, 107 N.M. 463, 760 P.2d 155.

This section prohibits 37-1-14 NMSA 1978 from applying in workmen's compensation and occupational disablement cases, since both the Workmen's Compensation Act and the Occupational Disablement Law contain specific statutes of limitations, 52-1-31 and 52-3-16 NMSA 1978, and neither act provides a saving clause allowing for an extension of the specified time limit for filing a claim. Ortega v. Shube, 1979-NMCA-130, 93 N.M. 584, 603 P.2d 323, overruled on other grounds by Bracken v. Yates Petroleum Corp., 1988-NMSC-072, 107 N.M. 463, 760 P.2d 155.

One-year statute of limitations in Workmen's [Workers'] Compensation Act bars second suit begun after the expiration of that year. Ortega v. Shube, 1979-NMCA-130, 93 N.M. 584, 603 P.2d 323, overruled on other grounds by Bracken v. Yates Petroleum Corp., 1988-NMSC-072, 107 N.M. 463, 760 P.2d 155.

Workers' compensation claims of minors and incapacitated persons. — Section 37-1-10 NMSA 1978, which extends the statute of limitations periods for claims of minors and incapacitated persons does not apply to workers' compensation claims which are governed by Section 52-1-31 NMSA 1978. Lent v. Employment Sec. Comm'n of State of N.M., 1982-NMCA-147, 99 N.M. 407, 658 P.2d 1134, cert. quashed, 99 N.M. 226, 656 P.2d 889 (1983).

Law reviews. — For annual survey of civil procedure in New Mexico, see 18 N.M.L. Rev. 287 (1988).

Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — Action to recover money or property loss and paid through gambling as affected by statute of limitations, 22 A.L.R.2d 1390.

LegalFix

Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.

LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.

The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.

You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.

The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.

Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

We have updated our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures.
Section 37-1-17 - [Other statutes prescribing limitations unaffected.]