A. Any county sheriff or municipal police officer who leaves his jurisdictional boundary while in fresh pursuit of a misdemeanant whom he would otherwise have authority to arrest shall have the authority to arrest that misdemeanant anywhere within this state and return him to the jurisdiction in which the fresh pursuit began without further judicial process.
B. For purposes of this section, "fresh pursuit of a misdemeanant" means the pursuit of a person who has committed a misdemeanor in the presence of the pursuing officer. Fresh pursuit shall not necessarily imply instant pursuit, but pursuit without unreasonable delay.
History: Laws 1981, ch. 102, § 1.
The authority to arrest is not limited to custodial arrest, but includes an investigative detention to issue a citation for a traffic violation. State v. Marquez, 2008-NMSC-055, 145 N.M. 1, 193 P.3d 548, rev'g 2007-NMCA-151, 143 N.M. 79, 173 P.3d 1.
Arrestable misdemeanor. — A municipal police officer is authorized to pursue a suspect outside the officer's territorial jurisdiction only if the officer has reason to believe that he or she has observed a violation of an arrestable offense. State v. Marquez, 2007-NMCA-151, 143 N.M. 79, 173 P.3d 1, cert. granted, 2007-NMCERT-011, 143 N.M. 155, 173 P.3d 762, rev'd, 2008-NMSC-055, 145 N.M. 1, 19 P.3d 548.
Commission of petty misdemeanor. — This section authorizes pursuit of a suspect into another county, whether the pursuing officer has reasonable cause to believe the suspect guilty of a misdemeanor or only of a petty misdemeanor. County of Los Alamos v. Tapia, 1990-NMSC-038, 109 N.M. 736, 790 P.2d 1017.
Extraterritorial arrest for D.W.I. — This section authorizes a municipal police officer to make an extraterritorial arrest for DWI. Incorporated Cnty. of Los Alamos v. Johnson, 1989-NMSC-045, 108 N.M. 633, 776 P.2d 1252.
Arrest on Indian reservation. — An arrest of a Navajo citizen on the Navajo Reservation by a city police officer following a car chase that started off the reservation was illegal since the officer failed to follow tribal extradition procedures; the misdemeanor fresh pursuit law did not affect the legality of the arrest. City of Farmington v. Benally, 1995-NMCA-019, 119 N.M. 496, 892 P.2d 629.
Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.
LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.
The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.
You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.
The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.
Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.