Except as provided in Section 3-12-2 NMSA 1978, members of governing bodies, excluding mayors, of municipalities having a population in excess of ten thousand shall reside in and be elected from single-member districts. If any member of the governing body permanently removes his residence from or maintains no residence in the district from which he was elected, he shall be deemed to have resigned. Once, following every federal decennial census, the governing body of the municipality shall divide the municipality into a number of districts equal to the number of members on the governing body. Such districts shall be compact and contiguous and composed of populations as nearly equal as practicable; provided that the governing body of H class counties and of any municipality having a population of ten thousand or less may provide for single-member districts as provided in this section.
History: 1978 Comp., § 3-12-1.1, enacted by Laws 1985, ch. 203, § 1; 1987, ch. 287, § 1; 1992, ch. 6, § 1.
Cross references. — For class H counties, see 4-44-3 NMSA 1978.
The 1992 amendment, effective May 20, 1992, substituted "Except as provided in Section 3-12-2 NMSA 1978" for "Notwithstanding any other provision of the Municipal Code" in the first sentence and substituted "H class" for "class H" in the last sentence.
The 1987 amendment, effective June 19, 1987, added the second sentence.
Constitutionality. — Although this section applies only to municipalities of over 10,000 population, it is not unconstitutional as written. Casuse v. City of Gallup, 1987-NMSC-112, 106 N.M. 571, 746 P.2d 1103.
Equal protection. — This section does not violate equal protection rights of the residents of Los Alamos County by exempting the county from the requirement of single-member districts. Montano v. Los Alamos Cnty., 1996-NMCA-108, 122 N.M. 454, 926 P.2d 307.
Exemption from requirement for single-member districts. — The proviso of this section stating that H class counties may provide for single-member districts unambiguously exempted Los Alamos County from the requirement that members of the governing body be elected from single-member districts. Montano v. Los Alamos Cnty., 1996-NMCA-108, 122 N.M. 454, 926 P.2d 307.
This section invalidates Gallup's home rule election charter that allows at-large elections for city councilors. Casuse v. City of Gallup, 1987-NMSC-112, 106 N.M. 571, 746 P.2d 1103.
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 56 Am. Jur. 2d Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions § 147.
"At-large" elections as violation of § 2 of Voting Rights Act of 1965 (42 USCS § 1973), 92 A.L.R. Fed. 824.
62 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations §§ 213 to 217.
Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.
LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.
The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.
You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.
The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.
Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.