13:1K-26. Risk reduction plan; review, hearing
a. Upon review of the Extraordinarily Hazardous Substance Accident Risk Assessment for each facility, the department shall, if appropriate, order the owner or operator of the facility to undertake an extraordinarily hazardous substance risk reduction plan. The order shall identify the risk or risks which must, within the limits of practicability and feasibility, be abated and a reasonable timetable for implementation of the plan. The department shall, by regulation, establish criteria or quantitative standards for determining risk, which criteria and standards shall reflect, among other factors, the size of the potentially exposed population and the gravity of consequences. The commissioner may order those operations posing the identified risk or risks that have not been abated on schedule to cease until the risk reduction plan has been implemented.
b. The owner of a facility who is aggrieved by an order issued pursuant to subsection a. of this section may petition the commissioner for a review of the matter, pursuant to which he shall provide the commissioner with all data and documents which he believes demonstrate that the order is unwarranted. If the commissioner, after review, affirms the initial order, he shall, at the request of the aggrieved owner, transmit all relevant materials and documents on the matter to the Office of Administrative Law, which shall conduct a hearing on the order pursuant to the provisions of P.L. 1978, c. 67 (C. 52:14F-1 et seq.). This hearing shall be an adjudicatory proceeding, and shall be conducted as a contested case pursuant to the "Administrative Procedure Act," P.L. 1968, c. 410 (C. 52:14B-1 et seq.). The department and the aggrieved owner of the facility shall be deemed parties in interest in the proceeding. Intervention in this hearing by any other person shall be as provided in the "Administrative Procedure Act." After review of the record of the adjudicatory proceeding and the recommendation of the administrative law judge, the commissioner shall affirm or modify his order. The decision of the commissioner shall constitute final agency action on the matter, and shall be subject only to judicial review as provided in the Rules of Court. During the pendency of the review and the hearing, the timetable for compliance with the order giving rise to the proceeding shall be suspended.
L. 1985, c. 403, s. 8, eff. Jan. 8, 1986.
Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.
LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.
The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.
You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.
The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.
Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.