NRS 90.430 - Denial, suspension, revocation, fine or condition on grounds of lack of qualification.

NV Rev Stat § 90.430 (2019) (N/A)

Copy with citation

Copy as parenthetical citation

The Administrator’s determination that an applicant or licensed person lacks qualification under NRS 90.420 is limited by the following provisions:

1. The Administrator may not enter an order against a broker-dealer because of the lack of qualification of:

(a) A person other than the broker-dealer if the broker-dealer is a natural person; or

(b) A sales representative of the broker-dealer.

2. The Administrator may not enter an order against an investment adviser because of the lack of qualification of:

(a) A person other than the investment adviser, if the investment adviser is a natural person; or

(b) Any representative of an investment adviser or other person who represents the investment adviser in doing an act that makes the person an investment adviser.

3. The Administrator may not enter an order solely on the basis of lack of experience if the applicant or registrant is qualified by training or knowledge, or both.

4. The Administrator shall consider that:

(a) A sales representative who will work under the supervision of a licensed broker-dealer need not have the same qualifications as a broker-dealer; and

(b) A representative of an investment adviser who will work under the supervision of a licensed investment adviser need not have the same qualifications as an investment adviser.

5. The Administrator shall consider that an investment adviser is not necessarily qualified solely on the basis of experience as a broker-dealer or sales representative.

(Added to NRS by 1987, 2160; A 1989, 160; 1995, 1449)

Previous Section

NRS 90.425 - Unethical or dishonest practices: Use of certain certifications and professional designations.

Next Section

NRS 90.435 - Mandatory suspension of license for failure to pay child support or comply with certain subpoenas or warrants; reinstatement of license. [Effective until the date of the repeal of 42 U.S.C. § 666, the federal law requiring each state to establish procedures for withholding, suspending and restricting the professional, occupational and recreational licenses for child support arrearages and for noncompliance with certain processes relating to paternity or child support proceedings.]

Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.

LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.

The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.

You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.

The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.

Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.