LegalFix

NRS 703.374 - Judicial review: Requirements for injunction; burden of proof; filing bond to place into effect proposed changes in schedule of rates.

NV Rev Stat § 703.374 (2019) (N/A)
Copy with citation
Copy as parenthetical citation

1. A court of competent jurisdiction, after hearing, may issue an injunction suspending or staying any final order of the Commission if:

(a) The applicant has filed a motion for a preliminary injunction;

(b) The applicant has served the motion on the Commission and other interested parties within 20 days after the rendition of the order on which the complaint is based;

(c) The court finds there is a reasonable likelihood that the applicant will prevail on the merits of the matter and will suffer irreparable injury if injunctive relief is not granted; and

(d) The applicant files a bond or other undertaking to secure the adverse parties in such manner as the court finds sufficient.

2. The decision of the Commission on each matter considered shall be deemed reasonable and just until set aside by the court. In all actions for an injunction or for any other relief, the burden of proof is upon the party attacking or resisting the order of the Commission to show by clear and satisfactory evidence that the order is unlawful or unreasonable.

3. If an injunction is granted by the court and the order complained of is one which:

(a) Disapproves a public utility’s proposed changes in a schedule of rates, or any part thereof, pursuant to NRS 704.061 to 704.110, inclusive; or

(b) Otherwise prevents the proposed changes in the schedule, or any part thereof, from taking effect,

the public utility complaining may place into effect the proposed changes in the schedule, or any part thereof, pending final determination by the court having jurisdiction, by filing a bond with the court in such an amount as the court may fix, conditioned upon the refund to persons entitled to the excess amount if the proposed changes in the schedule, or any part thereof, are finally determined by the court to be excessive.

(Added to NRS by 1983, 965; A 1995, 2607; 1997, 1887, 2666; 1999, 492; 2001, 3241; 2013, 739)

LegalFix

Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.

LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.

The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.

You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.

The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.

Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

We have updated our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures.
NRS 703.374 - Judicial review: Requirements for injunction; burden of proof; filing bond to place into effect proposed changes in schedule of rates.