LegalFix

75-20-232. Criteria for identifying proposed facilities that qualify for expedited review

MT Code § 75-20-232 (2019) (N/A)
Copy with citation
Copy as parenthetical citation

75-20-232. Criteria for identifying proposed facilities that qualify for expedited review. (1) In order for a facility to qualify for expedited review under 75-20-231, the department shall make a significance determination of the impacts associated with a proposed facility. This determination is the basis of the department's decision concerning whether the proposed facility qualifies for expedited review.

(2) The department shall consider the following criteria in determining the significance of each impact that the proposed facility has on the quality of the human environment:

(a) the severity, duration, geographic extent, and frequency of occurrence of the impact;

(b) (i) the probability that the impact will occur if the proposed action occurs; or

(ii) reasonable assurance in keeping with the potential severity of an impact that the impact will not occur;

(c) growth-inducing or growth-inhibiting aspects of the impact, including the relationship or contribution of the impact to cumulative impacts;

(d) the quantity and quality of each environmental resource or value that would be affected, including the uniqueness and fragility of those resources or values;

(e) the importance to the state and to society of each environmental resource or value that would be affected;

(f) any precedent that would be set as a result of an impact of the proposed action that would commit the department to future actions with significant impacts or to a decision in principle about future actions;

(g) potential conflict with local, state, or federal laws, requirements, or formal plans;

(h) the degree to which the impacts on the human environment are likely to create a high level of public concern; and

(i) the economic importance and benefits to the state and the local community of the proposed facility.

(3) An impact may be adverse, beneficial, or both. If none of the adverse effects of the impact are significant, expedited review is required.

History: En. Sec. 2, Ch. 329, L. 1997; amd. Sec. 12, Ch. 217, L. 2003.

LegalFix

Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.

LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.

The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.

You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.

The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.

Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

We have updated our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures.
75-20-232. Criteria for identifying proposed facilities that qualify for expedited review