33-2-1394. Settlement of actions against rehabilitator, liquidator, and employees -- court approval -- applicability. (1) If any legal action against an employee for which indemnity may be available under this section is settled prior to final adjudication on the merits, the insurer shall pay the settlement amount on behalf of the employee or indemnify the employee for the settlement amount unless the commissioner determines:
(a) that the claim did not arise out of or by reason of the employee's duties or employment; or
(b) that the claim was caused by the intentional or willful and wanton misconduct of the employee.
(2) In a legal action in which the rehabilitator or liquidator is a defendant, that portion of any settlement relating to the alleged act, error, or omission of the rehabilitator or liquidator is subject to the approval of the court before which the delinquency proceeding is pending. The court may not approve that portion of the settlement if it determines:
(a) that the claim did not arise out of or by reason of the rehabilitator's or liquidator's duties or employment; or
(b) that the claim was caused by the intentional or willful and wanton misconduct of the rehabilitator or liquidator.
(3) This section may not be construed to deprive the rehabilitator, liquidator, or employee of immunity, indemnity, benefit of law, right, or defense available under any provision of law, including, without limitation, the provisions of Title 2, chapter 9.
(4) (a) Except as otherwise provided, a legal action by a third party does not lie against the rehabilitator, liquidator, or employee based in whole or in part on any alleged act, error, or omission that took place prior to October 1, 1993, unless suit is filed and valid service of process is obtained by October 1, 1994. A legal action that is pending on or filed after September 30, 1993, by a liquidator or a liquidation estate will lie against a former special deputy liquidator or any employee, agent, or independent contractor retained by a special deputy liquidator without regard to when the alleged act, error, or omission occurred.
(b) Subsections (1) through (3) apply to any suit that is pending on or filed after October 1, 1993, without regard to when the alleged act, error, or omission took place.
History: En. Sec. 38, Ch. 596, L. 1993; amd. Sec. 31, Ch. 379, L. 1995.
Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.
LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.
The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.
You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.
The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.
Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.