LegalFix

Section 351.215 Books and records, minutes of meeting — shareholder's right to examine — acquiring person's demand deemed proper, when — penalty.

MO Rev Stat § 351.215 (2019) (N/A)
Copy with citation
Copy as parenthetical citation

Effective 28 Aug 1996

351.215. Books and records, minutes of meeting — shareholder's right to examine — acquiring person's demand deemed proper, when — penalty. — 1. Each corporation shall keep correct and complete books and records of account, including the amount of its assets and liabilities, minutes of the proceedings of its shareholders and board of directors, and the names and business or residence addresses of its officers; and it shall keep at its registered office or principal place of business in this state, or at the office of its transfer agent in this state, if any, books and records in which shall be recorded the number of shares subscribed, the names of the owners of the shares, the numbers owned by them respectively, the amount of shares paid, and by whom, and the transfer of such shares with the date of transfer. Each shareholder may at all proper times have access to the books of the company, to examine the same, and under such regulations as may be prescribed by the bylaws. Any written demand by an acquiring person to examine the books and records of account of each issuing public corporation for the purpose of communicating with the shareholders of an issuing public corporation in connection with a meeting of shareholders called pursuant to section 351.407 shall be deemed to have been made by a shareholder of the issuing public corporation for a reasonable and proper purpose.

2. If any officer of a corporation having charge of the books of the corporation shall, upon the demand of a shareholder, refuse or neglect to exhibit and submit them to examination, the officer shall, for each offense, forfeit the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars.

­­--------

(L. 1943 p. 410 § 48, A.L. 1979 S.B. 216, A.L. 1984 S.B. 409, A.L. 1996 S.B. 835)

(1956) Right of stockholder and director to inspect books of corporation and to make abstracts and memoranda therefrom discussed and defined. State ex rel. Watkins v. Cassell (A.), 294 S.W.2d 647.

(1956) Forfeiture under § 351.215 for refusal of officer of corporation to permit stockholder's inspection books held not subject to section 7, Art. IX of the Constitution but affords a right of action in favor of the stockholder. State ex rel. Watkins v. Cassell (A.), 294 S.W.2d 647.

(1958) Appointment of attorney and agent by minor stockholder to act for her in requesting corporate record inspection privilege held void. State ex rel. Dyer v. Union Electric Co. (A.), 309 S.W.2d 649.

(1958) Court did not err in denying plaintiff's claim as his daughter's natural guardian, under provisions of § 475.025 as it existed before reenactment in 1957, to forfeitures provided for in this section, since as to the stock plaintiff had no rights as natural guardian and upon determination of equitable issues adversely to plaintiff the court had no jurisdiction to render a judgment for plaintiff as to the forfeitures. Dyer v. Union Electric Co. (A.), 318 S.W.2d 401.

(1961) Stockholder had right to inspect books and documents of corporation and writ of mandamus issued to enforce right as to certain specified documents. State v. Ralston Purina Company (A.), 343 S.W.2d 631.

(1962) On transfer to supreme court judgment of trial court, quashing alternative writ, affirmed. Records and documents sought to be inspected were tentative studies prepared solely for information of management and were in nature of confidential inter-office communications and not "books" within meaning of statute. State v. Ralston Purina Company (Mo.), 358 S.W.2d 772.

(1971) Stockholder may have examination of books of corporation made by his attorney solely without stockholder being personally present. State ex rel. Armonette v. C. & R. Heating & Serv. Co. (A.), 475 S.W.2d 409.

(2002) Section does not expressly or implicitly abrogate common law right of inspection. State ex rel. Brown v. III Investments, 80 S.W.3d 855 (Mo.App.W.D.).

LegalFix

Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.

LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.

The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.

You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.

The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.

Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

We have updated our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures.