§996.1. Legislative findings

A. For more than sixty years, the Louisiana Legislature enacted laws to protect the public from the detrimental effects of misusing substances which are susceptible to abuse or which lead to addiction.

B. Act No. 634 of the 1972 Regular Session incorporated protections regarding controlled dangerous substances into the Louisiana Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Law.

C. In 2009 and 2010, Louisiana began experiencing increased incidents of individuals consuming synthetic cannabinoids as alternatives to marijuana, as well as increased incidents of individuals consuming substances which mimic the effects of amphetamines and cocaine and which are marketed as bath salts, fertilizer, and insect repellent.

D. These substances, which have been sold throughout Louisiana in retail establishments, have produced symptoms such as high blood pressure, severe hallucinations, anxiety, vomiting, seizures, delusions, and suicidal thoughts.

E. The chemical compositions of these substances make them relatively easy to alter by chemists resulting in the rapid production of new substances which circumvent statutes outlawing the production, manufacture, possession, and distribution of controlled dangerous substances having similar abuse potential and pharmacological effects.

F. These substances have not been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration as being safe for human consumption, are not subject to any quality control measures in their preparation, and do not have established dosages, making them extremely dangerous and potentially lethal.

G. These substances have a high potential for abuse and no acceptable medical use in treatment in the United States. There is a lack of accepted safety for use of the substances under medical supervision making these substances highly addictive and potentially lethal.

H. Article II, Section 1 of the Louisiana Constitution provides that the powers of government are divided into a legislative, executive, and judicial branch. Article II, Section 2 of the Louisiana Constitution provides that not one of these branches shall exercise power belonging to either of the other branches.

I. The Louisiana Legislature recognizes that the Louisiana Supreme Court, in State v. All Pro Paint & Body Shop, Inc., 639 So. 2d 707 (La. 1994), outlined a three-prong test to evaluate the constitutionality of a statutory delegation of legislative authority. The test provided that a statute delegating authority to an administrative agency is constitutionally valid if the enabling statute contains a clear expression of legislative policy, prescribes sufficient standards to guide the agency in the execution of that policy, and has adequate procedural safeguards to protect against abuse of discretion by that agency.

J. The Louisiana Legislature has a compelling interest in protecting the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens against the detrimental and deadly effects of these substances.

K. The options for the legislature to address the imminent hazard to the health, safety, and welfare for the people of the state of Louisiana are limited by the provisions of Article III, Section 2 of the Louisiana Constitution, which mandates an annual legislative session and provides mechanisms for the convening of an extraordinary or emergency session.

L. The Louisiana Legislature seeks to provide for a limited delegation of legislative authority within the parameters which have been defined by the Louisiana Supreme Court for the express purpose of protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the state from imminent harm.

M. Louisiana law authorizes the secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health to add a substance to the schedules of controlled dangerous substances based upon certain criteria. The provisions of R.S. 40:996.1 through 996.6 are intended to provide additional options for the secretary to address imminent hazards to the public health, safety, and welfare caused by dangerous substances.

Acts 2012, No. 347, §1; Acts 2018, No. 206, §4.