LegalFix

RS 19:136.7 - Contesting validity of proposed taking; waiver of defenses

LA Rev Stat § 19:136.7 (2018) (N/A)
Copy with citation
Copy as parenthetical citation

§136.7. Contesting validity of proposed taking; waiver of defenses

A. Any defendant desiring to contest and oppose the validity of the taking on the grounds that (1) the property taken was not expropriated for a public purpose or (2) the abandoned or blighted conditions of the property have been substantially rehabilitated, and all taxes and governmental liens have been paid, shall file a motion to dismiss the taking within fifteen days after the date on which the citation was served on him or a court-appointed curator on his behalf. The motion to dismiss the taking shall be served pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Article 1314. This motion shall be tried contradictorily as a summary proceeding with preference over all other matters to the judge alone and shall be decided prior to fixing the case for trial on the compensation or damages due to the defendant.

B. The ex parte order vesting title in the governing authority shall become final upon the failure of the defendant to timely file the opposition provided in Subsection A of this Section. If the defendant files an opposition, the ex parte order becomes final upon the rendering of a judgment in favor of the governing authority on the trial of the opposition or as otherwise provided in the Code of Civil Procedure.

Acts 2003, No. 984, §1; Acts 2004, No. 755, §1, eff. July 6, 2004.

LegalFix

Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.

LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.

The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.

You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.

The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.

Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

We have updated our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures.
RS 19:136.7 - Contesting validity of proposed taking; waiver of defenses