LegalFix

635-3 Dismissal for want of prosecution.

HI Rev Stat § 635-3 (2019) (N/A)
Copy with citation
Copy as parenthetical citation

§635-3 Dismissal for want of prosecution. The court may dismiss any action for want of prosecution after due notice to the claimants whenever claimants have failed to bring such action to trial within a period established by rule of court. Prior to dismissal of any action for want of prosecution, a court shall have adopted, promulgated, and published a rule or rules of court providing circumstances in which a claimant may seek relief from the judgment or order and such other safeguards as may be necessary. CC 1859, §1162; RL 1925, §2391; RL 1935, §4106; am L 1937, c 117, §1; am L 1939, c 145, §1; am L Sp 1941, c 56, §1; RL 1945, §10104; RL 1955, §231-4; HRS §635-3; am L 1972, c 89, §2B(a)

Rules of Court

Dismissal, see HRCP rule 41(b).

Law Journals and Reviews

Remedies to obtain dismissal for want of prosecution discussed. 3 HBJ, no. 3, at 2 (1965).

Case Notes

Defendant's joining in stipulation to remove a cause from trial calendar is action of the "defendant to delay or postpone trial". 45 H. 165, 363 P.2d 968 (1961).

Question as to continued effectiveness of section in view of HRCP 41(b) raised but not decided. 45 H. 165, 363 P.2d 968 (1961).

Matter of continuance in view of public climate is within court's discretion. 45 H. 478, 370 P.2d 739 (1962).

Application of six-year provision. 48 H. 152, 397 P.2d 593 (1964); 48 H. 290, 401 P.2d 449 (1965); 48 H. 303, 401 P.2d 456 (1965).

Factors to be considered in the exercise of the discretion to dismiss. 60 H. 125, 588 P.2d 416 (1978).

Cases prior to adoption of the Hawaii Rules of Civil Procedure.

Notice of motion, how made. 1 H. 14 (1847).

Rules for postponement of trial laid down. 1 H. 74 (1852).

Granting or refusing continuance at discretion of court. 7 H. 211 (1888); 8 H. 466 (1892); 14 H. 313 (1902); 29 H. 434 (1926); 33 H. 113 (1934); 34 H. 390 (1937).

Affidavit in support of continuance because of absence of witness should set out facts the witness is expected to prove. 8 H. 466 (1892).

Cited: 24 H. 97, 107 (1917); 33 H. 432, 439 (1935).

LegalFix

Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.

LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.

The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.

You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.

The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.

Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

We have updated our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures.
635-3 Dismissal for want of prosecution.