LegalFix

602-4 Superintendence of inferior courts.

HI Rev Stat § 602-4 (2019) (N/A)
Copy with citation
Copy as parenthetical citation

§602-4 Superintendence of inferior courts. The supreme court shall have the general superintendence of all courts of inferior jurisdiction to prevent and correct errors and abuses therein where no other remedy is expressly provided by law. [L 1892, c 57, §50; RL 1925, §2223; RL 1935, §3592; RL 1945, §9603; RL 1955, §214-3; HRS §602-4; ree L 1979, c 111, pt of §2]

Law Journals and Reviews

Through the Looking Glass--Finality, Interlocutory Appeals and the Hawaii Supreme Court's Supervisory Powers. 9 UH L. Rev. 87 (1987).

The Application of the Collateral Order Doctrine to Criminal Appeals in Hawai‘i. 19 UH L. Rev. 73 (1997).

Case Notes

Applied in disposing of appeal on points of law from an illegal sentence. 13 H. 335 (1901).

Appeals in forma pauperis, powers of supreme court in connection with. See 42 H. 1 (1957); 44 H. 31, 352 P.2d 616 (1959); 44 H. 52, 352 P.2d 629 (1959). But see 26 H. 469 (1922).

Circumstances supplied justification for exercise of court's supervisory jurisdiction and court's power to issue prohibition. 59 H. 224, 580 P.2d 49 (1978).

Supervisory power under section invoked to provide needed guidance on matter of grave public concern. 59 H. 224, 580 P.2d 49 (1978).

Supervisory jurisdiction invoked where submission to warrantless searches apparently standard condition of probation. 67 H. 268, 686 P.2d 1379 (1984).

Supervisory jurisdiction invoked to declare judge personally entering the jury room to answer the jurors' questions improper and prejudicial. 69 H. 204, 738 P.2d 812 (1987).

Supreme court invoked supervisory jurisdiction over district court judge. 71 H. 304, 788 P.2d 1281 (1990).

Exercise of supreme court's supervisory powers was not appropriate in case where defendant was not without remedy expressly provided by law; §641-11 and HRAP rule 4(b) provided defendant opportunity to appeal from final judgment and HRPP rule 40 may have provided defendant opportunity to contest validity of no-contest plea by post-conviction petition. 96 H. 462 (App.), 32 P.3d 106 (2001).

Mentioned: 79 H. 26, 897 P.2d 953 (1995).

LegalFix

Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.

LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.

The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.

You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.

The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.

Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

We have updated our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures.
602-4 Superintendence of inferior courts.