LegalFix

601-20 Court annexed arbitration program.

HI Rev Stat § 601-20 (2019) (N/A)
Copy with citation
Copy as parenthetical citation

§601-20 Court annexed arbitration program. (a) There is established within the judiciary a court annexed arbitration program which shall be a mandatory and nonbinding arbitration program to provide for a procedure to obtain prompt and equitable resolution of certain civil actions in tort through arbitration. The supreme court shall adopt rules for the implementation and administration of the program by January 1, 1987.

(b) All civil actions in tort, having a probable jury award value, not reduced by the issue of liability, exclusive of interest and costs, of $150,000 or less, shall be submitted to the program and be subject to determination of arbitrability and to arbitration under the rules governing the program. The rules shall include a procedure to classify and establish the order of priority according to which the actions will be processed for the determination of arbitrability and for the arbitration under the program. The court may, at its discretion, remove any action from the program.

(c) The chief justice may hire on a contractual basis, and at the chief justice's pleasure remove, without regard to chapter 76, an arbitration administrator, who shall be responsible for the operation and management of the program, and such other persons deemed necessary for the purposes of the program in the judgment of the chief justice. [L Sp 1986, c 2, §21; am L 2000, c 253, §150]

Cross References

Bypass of court annexed arbitration, see §671-16.5.

Center for alternative dispute resolution, see chapter 613.

Rules of Court

Applicability of Hawaii Arbitration Rules, see RCC rule 34.

Law Journals and Reviews

Settling Civil Lawsuits in the Hawaii Circuit Courts. 10 HBJ, no. 13, at 1 (2007).

The Impact of Discovery Limitations on Cost, Satisfaction, and Pace in Court-Annexed Arbitration. 11 UH L. Rev. 81 (1989).

Tort and Insurance "Reform" in a Common Law Court. 14 UH L. Rev. 55 (1992).

Striking a Balance: Procedural Reform Under the Lum Court. 14 UH L. Rev. 223 (1992).

Case Notes

Subsection (b) did not violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 76 H. 494, 880 P.2d 169 (1994).

LegalFix

Copyright ©2024 LegalFix. All rights reserved. LegalFix is not a law firm, is not licensed to practice law, and does not provide legal advice, services, or representation. The information on this website is an overview of the legal plans you can purchase—or that may be provided by your employer as an employee benefit or by your credit union or other membership group as a membership benefit.

LegalFix provides its members with easy access to affordable legal services through a network of independent law firms. LegalFix, its corporate entity, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, and contractors do not provide legal advice, services, or representation—directly or indirectly.

The articles and information on the site are not legal advice and should not be relied upon—they are for information purposes only. You should become a LegalFix member to get legal services from one of our network law firms.

You should not disclose confidential or potentially incriminating information to LegalFix—you should only communicate such information to your network law firm.

The benefits and legal services described in the LegalFix legal plans are not always available in all states or with all plans. See the legal plan Benefit Overview and the more comprehensive legal plan contract during checkout for coverage details in your state.

Use of this website, the purchase of legal plans, and access to the LegalFix networks of law firms are subject to the LegalFix Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

We have updated our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Disclosures.
601-20 Court annexed arbitration program.